Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Welcome to Stuff You Missed in History
0:02
Class from how Stuff Works dot com.
0:12
Hello, we welcome to the podcast. I'm editor
0:14
Knadas Keener, joined by fellow editor Kaden
0:17
Lambert. Good morning, candles, Good morning.
0:19
I'm trying to speak with a little something
0:21
extra in my voice, a note of enthusiasm
0:24
and excitement, because the topic
0:26
of today is happiness,
0:28
and you know it really started brings you down if
0:31
you hear it to your hosts talking about happiness and
0:33
the sling thing would rather slip their risk and
0:35
be talking into a microphone. I'll do what's
0:38
past everyone, um exclamation
0:40
points. Everywhere. Since
0:42
the recession, I've noticed that all
0:45
manner of publications and advertisements
0:48
have been pushing a different type
0:50
of fulfillment. You know, before with things
0:53
if you have this bracelet, if you have this car,
0:55
if you have this television, you know it'll
0:57
make you happier because it adds a new type
0:59
of Richmond to your daily life.
1:02
But now I read and I see things
1:04
about experiences as a way
1:06
to fulfillment, and it
1:09
seems like no matter if you're pushing a thing,
1:11
a tangible thing or an experience, there's
1:14
still marketing happiness. Can you
1:16
really do that and what
1:18
really is happiness. It
1:20
seems like it might be appropriate to turn back
1:22
to some of the oldest conceptions
1:25
of what happiness really is. So we
1:27
shall travel back to ancient Greece,
1:31
and we're gonna hang out with Herodotus Um,
1:33
who of course wrote the history, which
1:35
is one of the classics of classics, if
1:38
I can say that, and he tells
1:40
the story of Crisus and Solon.
1:42
Crisus was the richest
1:45
man pretty much on earth. He
1:47
was the king of Lydia. He was there Donald Trump,
1:49
and Solon was an adene lawgiver and
1:52
general wise man. And Crisis
1:55
said to Solon very confidently
1:57
that he thought he was the happiest man in the
1:59
world, and so On basically called him
2:01
an idiot and said the happiest man in
2:03
the world was a guy named tell Us, who
2:05
had been killed in battle at the prime of life.
2:08
And the second happiest people were two brothers,
2:10
Cleobus and Biden, who
2:12
had carried their mother to a festival,
2:15
yoked up to this cart like Oxen, and
2:17
then died. So basically, the three
2:19
happiest people in the world were all
2:22
dead, which
2:24
isn't really what you think of when you think of happiness
2:26
so much um. But his point was
2:28
that you can only figure out if you're happy
2:30
when you're dead, because the
2:33
possibility of chance and luck and fortune
2:35
that's ended at that point, and
2:38
otherwise you never know what's going to happen. The
2:40
Greek idea of happiness was very
2:43
dependent, I think, on the idea of chance,
2:45
and we should mention, while neither of us
2:47
has a degree in philosophy, if it has
2:49
done a marked amount of research, that
2:52
the closest word for happiness
2:55
in Greek seems to be youd ammonia,
2:57
which etymologically speaking at lay
3:00
means living in a way that's favored by
3:02
the gods, you meaning well and
3:05
de moon meaning a spirit. So
3:07
living well would be living
3:09
happily, or living in a way that's pleasing
3:12
to the gods. But happiness
3:14
in a way that we can see that it, which
3:16
could be ice cream cones and sunny
3:18
days or you know, a rainy day in
3:20
a book and an ice lamp, depending on what
3:23
type of personality you have, wasn't
3:26
It wasn't the way the Greeks thought about
3:28
it. It was more or less
3:30
a series of experiences,
3:32
and of course that would vary depending
3:35
on the philosopher you're looking at, and Katie's
3:37
mentioned Herodotus, and I think
3:39
that's an excellent place to start. And
3:42
at the risk of sounding like we're we're taking
3:44
off a list of different Greek philosophers,
3:46
we are because we wanted to give you all a broader
3:49
take of the Greek definition of happiness.
3:52
And someone I find particularly interesting
3:54
is Socrates. And Socrates
3:57
was all about the soul and virtue.
4:00
The Greek word for virtue is actually are
4:02
at, which means something more along
4:04
the lines of excellence. And socrates
4:07
Is question was what makes
4:09
an excellent person or what makes
4:11
an excellent life? And
4:14
it wasn't sensual pleasure, it wasn't money, it
4:16
wasn't family, so sorry family,
4:19
um. But he did have the idea that you
4:21
can't achieve happiness, which was pretty revolutionary.
4:24
This is something that you can get you personally,
4:27
and to get to that, what you have to do
4:29
is put your soul to rights. He basically
4:31
believed that your soul could rot and
4:33
die or it could flourish and you
4:35
could live this good, flourishing life and
4:37
the worst thing that could happen to you was to be a wicked
4:40
person. So wicked people can't be happy.
4:42
So just playing devil's advocate here, what
4:44
if you're born with
4:47
a wicked heart? I mean, I guess some people would
4:49
argue that some people are born with kinder
4:51
dispositions and some people have
4:53
more inherent nasty spirits.
4:56
And I think Aristotle had something
4:58
to say about what you're born
5:00
with and making the most of it. In terms of happiness,
5:03
Aristotle had a bit of a grimmer view of
5:05
happiness. Um, he thought it was really important
5:08
to be of good birth and to have lots of friends
5:10
and good friends, and money and children
5:12
and a healthy old age and on
5:15
and on. I presume he had all of these things himself.
5:18
Well, the problem is that if you don't
5:20
have these things, you can't be happy. But
5:22
you can't exactly choose what you're born into.
5:25
So that doesn't leave a lot of room for some of us.
5:28
And in fact, he didn't believe that
5:30
women had reason, and reason, of
5:32
course, was the way to get to happiness.
5:35
So chindas you and I are excluded
5:37
from this whole happy thing. Apparently so. But
5:40
I tend to be a pretty active person. I like
5:42
to do things exclamation point.
5:45
And that's a philosophy that Aristotle favored.
5:47
He didn't think that attaining happiness
5:49
happened by living passively. You had
5:51
to be active. You had to actively be conceiving
5:54
of ways to reach well
5:56
being. The thing about Aristotle was that
5:58
he believed that happiness was man's
6:01
highest purpose, that we actually have an
6:03
end point the teleological argument,
6:05
and that separates us from animals and plants
6:08
well, because we can think with reason, and
6:10
he thought reason was the one thing that separated us.
6:13
So if you acted with reason, you could
6:15
find your way to the highest good, which was yourn
6:17
ammonia happiness. But you
6:19
know, of course, as women couldn't get there. And
6:22
the thing that really gets a
6:24
little bit depressing, Sorry Happiness
6:26
podcast, was that he thought
6:28
the best kind of happiness was a godlike happiness,
6:31
which he also says is pretty much impossible
6:33
unless you're born into that state, right, not
6:35
even just you have to have all
6:37
of those prerequisites, the good birth, the good
6:40
family, and all the friends and the money
6:42
and everything. And then out
6:44
of those select few, because that narrows it
6:46
down a lot, a couple
6:48
of you, you know, might attain that whole godlike
6:50
happiness thing, but the rest of us are kind of screwed.
6:53
But I suppose if you're on the screwed
6:56
end of the spectrum and you don't have a good family,
6:58
and you're not attractive and you're
7:00
childless, which are all things he pointed out,
7:02
is being key to that state of contentment. You
7:05
could say that instead of being bitter
7:07
and cursing the state you're in, you could
7:10
always strive toward happiness. You
7:12
could you could take the point of view, well,
7:14
maybe I don't have all these facets
7:16
that are necessary, but I could still actively
7:18
pursue some sort of contentment
7:21
and well being well, and that might bring
7:23
us to some of the later philosophies. I know
7:25
you've been talking earlier about Epicureanism
7:28
exactly, And if
7:30
I had to pick a Greek philosophy
7:32
of happiness, I think I'd go with
7:35
Epicurean is um sort of the least of all
7:37
evils, because I have to say that if
7:39
one expects to live by some sort of Greek
7:41
philosophy in the modern age, you're hopelessly anachronistic.
7:43
And I don't think it's possible. And if you do, please
7:46
email me immediately because I want to know how
7:48
you're doing it. Um. Epicurus
7:50
advocated detaching
7:52
oneself from philosophy, essentially
7:54
being a type of hermit. He did say, however,
7:56
you can surround yourself with like minded folks
7:59
and a commune, which is where he lived. And
8:03
his big philosophy
8:05
was attaining pleasure
8:08
by avoiding pain. So
8:12
you know, it takes two objects to cause
8:14
friction. Two different services running against each
8:16
other is going to cause a spark, cause some sort
8:18
of disturbance, and he said, just
8:20
avoid it, no friction. That's okay.
8:22
You'll be happier if you just avoid that all
8:25
together. And he was
8:27
a hedonist, and today we may think of
8:29
a hedonist to someone who drinks too much and parties
8:31
too much and eats too much. But his
8:33
definition or the definition that he abided
8:36
by, was a little bit different. Um,
8:38
Miriam Woobster just defines it as
8:40
the doctrine that pleasure or happiness
8:42
is the soul or chief good in
8:45
life. And we're not talking a Dionysian
8:48
sort of hedonism. He was epicurious,
8:52
advocated a sort of ascetic lifestyle
8:54
like Candice was saying, you know, living in a living
8:56
kind of as a hermit. And even
8:59
though he wasn't a set, he didn't believe in deprivation.
9:02
Necessarily, he believed in moderation and
9:04
simplicity, And just for argument's
9:06
sake, I think that there's a whole industry today
9:09
built on the idea of simplicity. You
9:11
could confine yourself to a
9:14
diet of bread and peanut butter, but if
9:16
you go to a gourmet grosser and buy a fourteen
9:18
dollar jar of almond butter and a ten
9:20
dollar loaf of fancy bread,
9:23
you're not exactly being an epicurean
9:25
well, And I think the bottom line Frebertarianism
9:28
was that if you don't want a lot of
9:30
things, you can satisfy those
9:32
few things that you have. Like, the worst
9:34
thing that could happen is to have a bunch of unfulfilled
9:37
longings. And if you get rid of those
9:39
desires by saying you only want, say, three
9:41
things, instead of three hundred things, you
9:44
up your chances of actually being able to accomplish
9:46
that. And he also put
9:49
mind over body in terms of
9:51
happiness, the idea of an intellectual
9:54
pleasure versus some sort of carnal
9:57
or corporeal pleasure. And this is something
9:59
that John Stewart Mill picked up on later when
10:01
he talked about the kernel pleasures
10:03
of food and drinking sex, and
10:05
Epicurius actually advocated abstaining from
10:07
sex as well as substaining from marriage.
10:10
So well, there you go. But the
10:12
exact opposite of hedonism as we would
10:14
think of it today, really, but he
10:16
would have argued that no matter what circumstance
10:19
you're and no matter how painful it is, as
10:21
long as you can put your mind over that
10:24
situation, you can find
10:26
pleasure mind every body. Aren't there
10:28
all sorts of magicians today who talk about
10:30
putting mind everyone's body? Are
10:32
you saying, Epicaris, It's like David Copperfield, I
10:35
don't know about that. It's an interesting proposition.
10:38
I think one of the most striking things about Epicureanism
10:41
was that Epicarius believed that there are
10:43
gods who exist, but they're not
10:45
even concerned with us. They
10:47
don't care about you, They really
10:49
don't. They like to do
10:51
exactly god like things. And
10:54
he was implying basically that you can make your own
10:56
destiny because the gods don't care you're
10:59
here, you're in motion, not do it, you will
11:01
well. And if there is no divine order, the
11:04
only things you have to depend on to figure
11:06
out what's good and what's bad are
11:09
your senses. And obviously
11:11
pleasure is good. When you things are pleasurable,
11:13
you feel good, and when you're in pain or
11:15
you're anxious, you feel terrible.
11:18
And stoicism is actually supposed to be
11:20
the opposite of Epicureanism. They
11:23
believed. Stoics believed that the
11:25
universe was rational, harmonious whole,
11:27
and since human beings are also rational,
11:30
we should be able to find our place by
11:33
living in a virtuous way, by living
11:35
an excellent life. And it's funny
11:37
because stoicism is supposed to be the total opposite
11:39
of Epicureanism, but they do have a
11:41
lot of things in common. They believe
11:43
that you should be happy regardless of the external
11:46
factors of what was going on. So you
11:48
can't control the things that happened to you, unlike
11:50
Aristotle. You know, you can't control how
11:53
you're born and what you're born into, and
11:55
you can't control disease and famine war,
11:58
but you should be able to find
12:00
your happiness regardless of what's going on.
12:03
You should be stoic in the way that we
12:05
use it today. And for
12:07
the sake of argument and presenting another
12:09
side of the happiness story, we're
12:11
going to travel much further into
12:14
the future, not the present day, but back
12:16
during the Romantic period. And
12:19
this has a little to nothing to do
12:21
with the Greek philosophers, but it presents
12:23
a very interesting contrast to
12:25
their ideas of attaining happiness.
12:28
And there's a book that came out not too
12:30
long ago by Eric Wilson called
12:33
Against Happiness and Praise of Melancholy.
12:36
And Wilson is a noted professor of
12:38
Romanticism at wake Forest University,
12:41
and he abides by
12:44
the philosophy of melancholia,
12:46
and essentially what he explained in
12:49
his word is that melancholy is an essential
12:51
part of being a human
12:53
being, and he defines it as
12:56
a very active state. When we're melancholy,
12:59
we feel uneasy in
13:01
relation to the way things are, the
13:03
status quo, the conventions of
13:05
our society. We yearn for a deeper,
13:08
richer relationship to the world. And
13:11
he goes on, but I'm going to trail off there. And
13:13
what struck me about this definition
13:16
of melancholy and how it's
13:18
a necessary contrast to living
13:20
happily and obliviously some might
13:23
say, is that it's so different
13:25
from this idea of epicurean detachment
13:28
it's sort of like being
13:30
immersed in a world that you don't understand.
13:32
You may be unlucky in it, you may
13:34
not have a strong foothold in it. But
13:37
that's a good thing. That's an excellent thing
13:39
because it makes you almost hyper aware
13:42
of your surroundings and your place in
13:44
the world. And unlike the Stoics who would
13:46
say take your lot and live with it, he's
13:49
essentially saying, yeah, take
13:51
your lot, but look how much
13:53
you can do with it. Because out
13:55
of this state of awareness and dissatisfaction
13:58
comes great art, great
14:00
poetry, which of course the
14:03
Greeks had in spades when you look
14:05
back at all sorts of Greek art
14:07
and architecture and literature. What
14:10
they also had and what we enjoy
14:12
so much today, is the idea of democracy.
14:16
And I was reading a really
14:18
good book called Happiness, a History by
14:20
Darren McMahon, and he
14:22
was positing that perhaps the
14:24
idea of democracy led to all these
14:27
questionings of what happiness is and how you
14:29
achieve it because people had a
14:31
choice. They had a choice to elect
14:33
who they wanted, a choice to participate at least
14:36
in the process. And maybe
14:38
you can also participate in the process of achieving
14:40
your own happiness. And at the risk of sounding
14:42
like a kindergarten teacher, we have that choice
14:44
to every day when you wake up, you choose whether
14:46
or not you're going to have them quote unquote right
14:49
attitude. But happiness
14:52
is, you know, it's more than just the smile
14:54
you put on for the rest of the world. It
14:57
is really no matter what philosophy you live
14:59
your life by. It it's how you find enjoyment
15:01
and fulfillment. And if you look at happiness
15:04
like a line graph, it's
15:06
different for everyone. For some people who live
15:09
contentedly and happily, it's probably just
15:11
a straight line. For other people who
15:13
depend on experiences
15:15
or themes to make their day, you probably
15:17
see a line that goes up very
15:20
sharply with a peak of happiness and then plummets
15:22
with the trough of unhappiness and then up and down
15:24
and up and down. And whether
15:26
you prefer that type of line graph for your happiness
15:29
cycle or a straight line again
15:32
your choice. I feel like I should start singing
15:34
more than a feeling. Oh that's a great
15:36
song, um, and Katie actually is
15:38
about too, but working to spare all of your
15:40
ears. So we'll go ahead and let
15:42
all of you go, But if you have any ideas,
15:44
and for heaven's sake, if you are a real philosopher
15:46
and you want to weigh in on any of this, email
15:49
us at History podcast at how stuff
15:51
works dot com or common on the blog.
15:54
And for more about the ancient Greeks and
15:56
ancient civilization, be sure to visit the
15:58
website at how stuff works dot com.
16:01
For more on this and thousands of other topics,
16:04
visit how stuff works dot com and be sure
16:06
to check out this stuff you missed in History Class blog
16:08
on the how stuff works dot com home page
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More