Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
If you're listening to this podcast, you
0:02
must recognize the value of asking questions.
0:04
At Aramco, our questions
0:06
help us engineer a better future. How
0:09
can today's resources fuel our shared
0:11
tomorrow? How can we deliver energy
0:14
to a world that can't stop? How
0:16
can we deliver one of the fuels of the future? How
0:19
can we sow curiosity to harvest
0:21
ingenuity?
0:23
To learn more about how innovation drives us
0:25
forward, visit aramco.com slash
0:27
poweredbyhow.
0:30
Have you ever Googled your own name? Prepare
0:32
for a shock because your personal info, including
0:34
addresses and phone numbers, is all out
0:36
there. It's all harvested by data brokers
0:39
and sold legally. Aura
0:41
is a personal digital security service that scans
0:43
the internet for your sensitive information and
0:45
provides a full suite of privacy-enhancing tools.
0:48
For a limited time, Aura is offering listeners a
0:50
14-day free trial at aura.com
0:53
slash safety. That's A-U-R-A
0:55
dot com slash safety to learn more
0:58
and activate the 14-day trial period.
1:10
Hello everyone and welcome to the History
1:13
of Byzantium, episode 276,
1:15
Pax, War and Peace in
1:19
Rome's Golden Age, with Tom
1:22
Holland. I
1:25
imagine for many of you, Tom Holland requires
1:27
no introduction, but just in case,
1:30
he is a London-based historian who has now
1:33
written three books covering Roman
1:35
history.
1:36
He's also written books about the first
1:38
millennium, the Greco-Persian war,
1:41
as well as two particularly groundbreaking
1:43
books about religion.
1:45
The first, In the Shadow of the Sword,
1:48
was the subject of an interview on this podcast
1:50
back in 2014 when we
1:52
were covering the origins of Islam.
1:55
Recently he wrote a book called
1:57
Dominion, where he charted the influence
1:59
of Christianism. Christianity, from its capture
2:01
of the Romans all the way to modern
2:03
times. If that sounds
2:06
at all dry, believe me, it
2:08
is the opposite. It is an exhilarating
2:10
argument that essentially beginning with the Crusades,
2:13
Western Christianity set itself on the path
2:16
towards the Enlightenment, science,
2:18
atheism, and perhaps even
2:21
woe. Tom
2:23
Holland is such a fascinating writer. He
2:25
has the skill I so admire in the best
2:27
historians I've read of taking you back
2:30
into the mindset of earlier people,
2:33
stripping away or perhaps putting back
2:35
on layers of meaning which we've
2:37
missed out on. His
2:40
first Romans-only book, Rubicon,
2:42
covered the fall of the Republic, his
2:44
second, Dynasty, took the story from Julius
2:46
Caesar's death to that of Nero, and
2:49
his latest book, Pax, takes
2:51
us up to the death of Hadrian. I
2:55
imagine that, like me, you
2:57
all know the story of this period pretty well.
3:00
It's Tom's great skill to tell the story in a way
3:03
that brings out insights which you didn't realise
3:05
were there to be drawn out, and that's
3:07
what I talk to him about in today's interview.
3:11
Tom's books are available everywhere good books are
3:13
sold, but if you'd like to listen to one,
3:16
then why not try Audible? Audible's
3:19
massive collection of books and podcasts probably
3:21
needs no introduction either, but
3:23
you could listen to Pax for free if
3:26
you sign up at audibletrial.com forward
3:28
slash Byzantium. In
3:30
the past, Tom has delegated the reading
3:33
of these books to voice actors, but for Pax,
3:36
he does the talking himself, and
3:38
I know that will be a selling point to those of you who
3:40
are now hooked on Tom's podcast, The
3:43
Rest is History. I'll
3:45
repeat that Audible offer at the end of the show, but
3:47
for now, here's the interview.
4:00
are now the busiest man in history
4:02
and podcasting. We are incredibly grateful
4:05
for your time. We last spoke
4:08
in 2014 when I was covering
4:10
the origins of Islam and since
4:12
then you've written Dynasty, Rise
4:15
and Fall of the House of Caesar, covering
4:17
Caesar's death to Nero's death,
4:20
and now you've written Pax, War
4:22
and Peace in Rome's Golden Age, taking us from Nero's
4:24
death to that of Hadrian in 138 AD, and that's
4:27
obviously what we'll be talking about today. But
4:30
I wanted to start by asking about the
4:32
book you wrote in between those two, Dominion,
4:36
The Making of the Western Mind, or perhaps more
4:38
revealingly the American subtitle, How the Christian
4:40
Revolution Remade the World. I
4:43
can't recommend Dominion highly enough to
4:45
those listening. It's one of the most mind-blowing
4:48
history books I've ever read. You know,
4:51
I'm loving this already. This
4:53
is going so well. I mean
4:56
we could think of it. I could just talk about that for now, but
4:58
just keep on with the play. One
5:01
of the points you made in that book is that people,
5:04
particularly in the West today, are so saturated
5:07
in Christian ideas that it's very hard
5:09
to fathom how different the moral
5:11
universe of people in the pre-Christian
5:14
past was, and you begin Pax
5:16
by saying the Romans of that period
5:19
were compellingly different
5:21
to us. So am I right in seeing
5:23
the influence of Dominion on how you approached
5:26
this period of Roman history? Yeah,
5:28
so the
5:32
period that I'm covering, obviously Christians
5:35
are there, but as I say in the introduction,
5:37
they are like tiny shrews
5:40
scampering around a Mesozoic ecosystem,
5:43
and in the long run the mammals
5:46
will inherit the earth, but at the moment I'm
5:48
interested in the dinosaurs. Well
5:51
I wanted to get into that. How do you
5:54
approach
5:56
understanding of pre-Christian people?
5:59
Or maybe I should say
5:59
pre-secular
6:01
people because I think we
6:03
really struggle to understand how the
6:07
divine influenced
6:09
people because we've created this separation
6:12
from it. So I think that, and
6:15
this is a conclusion I've come to over many,
6:17
many years, but it's one that's always nagged
6:19
at me and it now pretty much obsesses
6:22
me, that there is
6:24
a flaw with the
6:27
methodology of academic
6:30
scholarship in the 21st century. I
6:32
mean, it's achieved so much, we couldn't look at
6:34
the past without it, and yet there are
6:36
certain costs. And one of the problems
6:39
is that in its fundamentals,
6:42
it's very, very materialist. And
6:46
the past was not a materialist world. People
6:50
did not have materialist attitudes. People
6:52
believed that the world was
6:55
full of gods, that the interface of
6:58
the supernatural and the natural was
7:00
so profound that it barely made
7:02
any sense to distinguish them. And
7:05
I think that that is true, say, of
7:10
the Christian centuries of the Middle
7:12
Ages and of late antiquity. But
7:15
at least we are very much
7:17
the heirs of that way of thinking.
7:20
So to go back to a world where you not
7:23
only have to smear away the kind of the materialist
7:25
assumptions, but you also have to smear
7:27
away the Christian presumptions is really
7:30
difficult, because it's
7:32
the nature of assumptions that you tend not to recognize that you
7:34
have them. I'm
7:37
sure lots of people who
7:39
write about antiquity,
7:41
and I was certainly one of them. And
7:44
this was kind of focused for me by the book that you mentioned at
7:46
the start of this, Shadow of the Sword.
7:49
I felt that I was in writing that, that I was being
7:51
objective and neutral in
7:53
looking at the various ways
7:55
that Jews and Zoroastrians
7:57
and Christians and Muslims understood the mention
8:00
of the supernatural. But of course, I wasn't at all.
8:02
And specifically with Islam, the
8:05
the assumption I brought to looking
8:08
at the life of Muhammad and the historicity
8:10
of the Quran and the origins of the Quran
8:14
were deeply materialist. So I wasn't
8:17
being neutral at all. It's perfectly
8:19
possible to explain the origins of Islam as
8:21
Muslims have always done as an intrusion of the
8:23
divine into the fabric of the
8:25
mortal and the earthly. But I wasn't going to do
8:27
that. That doesn't make me neutral. So
8:31
with the Romans, you have to try and
8:34
come to terms with their understanding of
8:36
the divine. You have to get rid of your material
8:38
assumptions, you have to get rid of your Christian assumptions. And
8:40
both of them are so, we
8:43
are so marinated in them that it's, I
8:45
think, very difficult to do that. You
8:47
have to make a conscious effort, I think.
8:50
Well,
8:51
let's talk about this unnervingly
8:54
different culture with
8:57
an example that was quite unfamiliar
8:59
to me. I had forgotten this from that
9:01
earlier period of Roman history. So I suspect some
9:03
listeners will too, which
9:06
is the tale of Sporus. Could
9:09
you remind the listeners of this? Because I think this is probably
9:11
the most unnerving story
9:14
from the book. So if any of your listeners have watched Succession,
9:19
they may have picked up on this story because Tom
9:22
Wamsgams is always citing
9:24
it to cousin Greg. And I can
9:26
claim personal responsibility for that. I was
9:28
the Julia Claudian advisor. I
9:31
went in and talked to the writers before they
9:33
began working on the script for
9:35
Succession. Fantastic. So very
9:38
proud of that. It is a terrible
9:40
story. And to be fair, it was seen as
9:42
a pretty terrible story by
9:45
the Romans themselves. It was seen as a marker of Nero's
9:47
depravity. Because of course, whenever
9:49
there's some shocking story, you can be sure that Nero
9:52
isn't far away from it. So
9:55
Nero's, the great love of Nero's
9:58
life was a woman called Papaya Sabanc. who
10:00
had amber colored hair, had her own
10:02
cosmetics range. She
10:05
was the one who bathed in acid milk, not Cleopatra.
10:09
Long before Peat Town's end, she said, I hope
10:11
I die before I get old. So she was very,
10:13
she was unbelievably sophisticated.
10:16
Nero, a daughter. The
10:18
story, the gossip
10:20
is that Nero comes home from
10:23
the races one day. Papaya
10:25
is heavily pregnant with Nero's son,
10:27
maybe son, maybe daughter we don't know,
10:29
but Nero, I think, assumed it was a son. She
10:32
snaps at him, he kicks her in the stomach and she dies, and
10:34
the baby dies as well. We
10:36
have no way of knowing if that story is true. I personally
10:39
doubt it. It's a commentary on how
10:42
the Romans saw Nero. But
10:45
certainly there's no doubt in the Titanic scale
10:47
of Nero's grief, and
10:49
he gives Papaya a sensational send-off,
10:52
full funeral in the Forum. She's
10:54
mummified, laid to rest in the Mausoleum
10:56
of Augustus. The full work
10:58
of Nero incinerates a
11:00
vast quantity of incense in her honor.
11:03
And he goes on to marry
11:05
another woman who's rather like Papaya, kind
11:08
of aristocratic, sophisticated, smart,
11:10
clearly Nero's type. But
11:13
the story goes that Nero misses
11:18
the physicality of someone who looks like
11:20
Papaya. And so he sends scouts out
11:23
across the Empire looking for someone, and
11:25
the scouts duly find someone. The
11:27
twist is that this person is not
11:30
a female but a male, very
11:32
young boy. He's castrated,
11:35
Nero christens him. It doesn't christen him, obviously,
11:38
because he's not president. Now you see the importation of
11:40
Christian prejudices. He calls
11:42
him Sporus, which is a grim,
11:45
Neronian joke, because Sporus in Greek is
11:47
spunk. And of course Sporus
11:49
no longer has any spunk. But
11:52
principally, this poor boy girl
11:56
is called Papaya, because from this
11:58
point on, he, she, is Christian. treated as
12:00
being papaya, where's the hair,
12:03
cosmetics, dress, everything
12:06
to look like papaya. And
12:10
in due course when Nero kills
12:13
himself, papaya,
12:16
Sporis, is there and
12:18
does the mourning over his body as a bereaved
12:22
wife should, gets picked
12:24
up as a trophy of war by the commander of the Praetorians
12:27
who's betrayed Nero. He gets
12:29
overambitious, gets killed
12:33
and papaya Sporis
12:35
gets picked up by Oso
12:38
who had actually been married to
12:40
the original papaya before Nero
12:43
kind of appropriated her.
12:47
So for Oso it must have been very
12:49
odd, you know suddenly sleeping
12:52
with someone who looks like his dead wife. Oso
12:55
of course then succumbs
12:58
in his legions defeated,
13:00
he commits suicide rather nobly rather
13:02
than carry on a civil war and
13:04
so Sporis becomes the property of Vitellius,
13:07
the pie-loving
13:11
commander of the German legions who becomes
13:14
the third of the three emperors in the year of the four
13:16
emperors. So Vitellius
13:18
thinks that by this point Sporis
13:20
is clearly soiled goods, doesn't want him,
13:23
her. So decides that
13:25
he will show
13:27
the Roman people what a great guy he is by staging
13:30
an incredible entertainment which
13:32
involves dressing Sporis
13:35
up as a plesipina and
13:38
dressing up a load of gadiators as
13:42
Pluto and having Sporis
13:45
gang-raped to death in the arena and
13:47
at this point unsurprisingly the poor boy kills
13:49
himself and the
13:51
thing I think that
13:55
is most startling about
13:58
that is that
13:59
Thalleus thought this was a way to show what a great
14:02
guy he was. I mean, there's a chasm
14:04
of difference from us than that.
14:10
Nero, what Nero is doing
14:13
by
14:14
creating this similar acrum of a woman,
14:17
to the degree that he offers large amounts of money
14:19
to doctors who could implant
14:21
a womb in Sporas's body,
14:25
is that he is pushing to the limits a
14:28
sexual trend among the Roman elite
14:31
and pushing
14:34
it to excess, as Nero does with
14:36
almost everything. Because the
14:38
great craze among the
14:40
Roman elite is for boys who look like
14:43
girls. And delicati
14:45
they're called, pretty boys. And their
14:48
hair is conferred and teased
14:50
and crimped and permed and they
14:52
wear cosmetics and silks and all this kind
14:55
of thing. And the
14:59
more of a delicatus the slave
15:01
boy is, the more valuable
15:03
he is. And
15:06
Nero is just pushing this trend to an absolute
15:08
limit that no one will ever rival. And
15:10
it's very, very, in that way, very Nero behaviour.
15:14
I was going to say, and I think people
15:16
have to read the book to see the way you manfully
15:20
explain what
15:23
we would see as Peter
15:26
Phillip behaviour or what have you. Well it is Peter
15:28
Phillip behaviour. And
15:31
to our way of thinking it's entirely shocking. It's
15:33
child abuse, it involves
15:37
slavery, it's
15:39
shocking by our standards. But
15:43
you can acknowledge the shock that you feel as someone
15:46
in the 21st century. But
15:49
that of course, provokes the question,
15:51
well why do I feel this sense of shock? Where has this sense
15:53
of shock come from? Where has the process of cultural
15:55
dislocation happened? Because clearly to
15:57
the Romans it was more than acceptable.
15:59
And
16:00
why do you think Vitellius thinks people
16:03
will enjoy
16:05
that spectacle?
16:07
Because it's the job of Caesar
16:10
to entertain the people with
16:12
edifying spectacles. And
16:16
Vitellius, although he had been a friend of Nero's,
16:18
is concerned,
16:21
I think, to, to
16:24
market himself as a
16:26
rough, tough, bluff military man,
16:29
because he's very much a person of size.
16:32
And I think he wants to market him his size
16:34
as being military bulk, rather
16:36
than the kind of epicine folds
16:39
of fat, which is in the long
16:41
run, how he'll come to be interpreted. And
16:44
I think that by
16:47
by having
16:53
this eunuch who had gone
16:55
to bed with Othe who he has displaced,
16:58
saying, no, you know, this is, this is
17:02
grotesque behavior, this, you know, this is a
17:04
grotesque who is stained
17:06
by the attentions of all the
17:08
men who have gone before. And it's disgusting
17:11
that Othe would have slept with someone who'd also slept with a
17:13
praetorian in Nero. He
17:15
is trying to cast himself as a
17:17
kind of arbiter of morality. And,
17:20
you know, the Romans
17:22
obviously didn't think that inflicting
17:26
atrocities on people in
17:28
the arena was in any way immoral. Quite
17:30
the contrary, they thought it was very moral. And
17:33
they tended to have the assumption that
17:36
the spectacles that were staged
17:38
in the in the arena were
17:41
an illustration of how the Romans were absolutely
17:44
the most moral people on the face of
17:46
the earth. And unless you get that,
17:49
you don't you can't possibly begin
17:51
to see the world through Roman eyes and understand
17:54
the world that they're inhabiting. Absolutely.
17:56
Well, I, you know, this is why
17:58
I encourage people to read the book. because it's
18:01
peeling back layers or putting layers back on
18:03
perhaps. Yeah, I think so, yeah. Yeah,
18:06
so I mean listeners will be
18:08
pretty familiar with the outline of the narrative,
18:11
the year of the four emperors, the rise of Vespasian,
18:16
followed by after his dynasty, the
18:18
so-called five good emperors taking
18:21
power. This is obviously Pax,
18:24
this is the golden age of the Roman Empire as
18:27
Edward Given has framed it. And
18:29
we might think that the Romans
18:31
of this period would be saying things like
18:34
it was 1990. This is the end
18:36
of history, this is an empire on
18:39
which the sun will never set. But actually throughout
18:42
the book, you sense
18:45
anxiety, fear, a lot of
18:47
worry about this
18:49
situation from Roman thinkers. Well,
18:52
in the year of the four emperors,
18:54
there is fighting on the streets of Rome.
18:56
The Tepotelius ultimately is toppled
18:59
by the troops of Vespasian, Vespasian's
19:01
dynasty, the Flavian, so Flavian troops. And
19:04
he ends up sliced to pieces on
19:06
the Gomonian steps. And
19:10
the spectacle
19:13
of this year, when the peace that
19:15
people assumed had been
19:18
secured by the
19:20
divine Augustus, dissolved
19:22
away, and
19:26
it seemed like provinces would collapse and crumble
19:29
away and the entire order of the Roman
19:31
world melt away. And since the
19:34
order of the Roman world had been blessed by the gods, it
19:36
suggested that the gods were angry with the
19:38
whole of humanity and who knew what would
19:40
happen. These
19:42
are very vivid fears that
19:45
people across the empire feel. And
19:48
the great spectacle of
19:50
reconstruction is something that Vespasian
19:53
takes incredibly seriously. But
19:55
there are markers
19:58
that particularly
20:00
Buffett the Roman world in
20:02
the wake of Vespasian's death in 79 so
20:06
the rule of his elder son Titus that
20:10
seemed palpably
20:12
to signal the anger of the gods
20:15
so the holiest
20:17
building in Rome, the
20:19
Temple of Jupiter on the capital burns
20:21
down for the second time in a decade there's
20:25
a terrible plague and of course
20:27
most notoriously there's the eruption of Vesuvius
20:30
and Vesuvius entombed the cities
20:33
of Pompeii and Herculaneum which means that
20:35
the funeral rites can't be performed for
20:37
all the dead in those two cities so
20:40
their ghosts have to be assumed to be wandering
20:43
the Bay of Naples the ash
20:46
that is spewed out by Vesuvius it
20:50
lingers along in the air causing
20:53
weird celestial phenomena
20:57
strange sunsets as far as Syria so
21:00
it absolutely seems like the gods
21:04
are angry with the Roman people and
21:06
a religio
21:09
to a Roman I mean
21:13
it's the Latin word from which our
21:15
word religion derives but it should not absolutely
21:18
not be translated as religion a religio is
21:21
a bond that joins humanity
21:24
to the gods and it's a kind of obligation
21:27
that is paid say whether it's a priesthood or
21:29
a festival or some form of celebration
21:32
and it's a kind of down payment, it's a kind of insurance
21:35
so if things are going wrong you know that you
21:37
haven't your
21:39
insurance is running down and you need to start
21:42
re-establishing those religio-nes and
21:44
I think that that is what Titus is doing with
21:47
the Colosseum the inauguration
21:49
of the Colosseum is an attempt
21:54
to offer up morally
21:56
edifying lessons to the Roman people
21:58
who are now the Colosseum should be
22:00
understood as a great census in stone, an
22:04
ordering of the Roman people as they should be properly
22:07
ordered, but also something
22:09
that will be pleasing to the gods. But
22:12
the person who really takes this mission on board,
22:14
I think, is Titus' younger brother, Domitian, who
22:16
succeeds in Titus' dying after
22:18
a very short reign. And Domitian is,
22:22
he has a terrible reputation,
22:25
he was clearly a very charmless man. He is
22:27
the first emperor to unapologetically
22:29
refer to himself as Dominus' Lord
22:32
Master, which was a title that Augustus
22:34
had very pointedly refused. But
22:36
Domitian embraces it, and I think he embraces
22:39
it because he feels that
22:41
that's exactly what it is, that he has been entrusted
22:44
by the gods with the great mission
22:46
of restoring the Roman people
22:49
to their favour, and he does it in all kinds
22:51
of ways. So he
22:54
attempts to stabilise the currency,
22:56
he attempts to stabilise the frontier,
22:59
he attempts to reform morals, he
23:02
is micromanaging every
23:04
expression of obligation
23:06
to the gods, and he feels
23:09
that, I think, he
23:11
is the deputy
23:15
of the heavens. And this is
23:18
a podcast about Byzantium, not about pre-Christian
23:22
Rome. But I do, the
23:24
thing that Domitian reminds
23:26
me of is a particularly
23:28
autocratic Christian emperor, an
23:31
emperor who has the utmost conviction
23:34
that he is responsible for the heavens,
23:36
for the moral guidance of the
23:38
Roman world. But of course
23:41
Domitian lacks the theological
23:45
heft that Christianity will come
23:47
to provide the Byzantine
23:50
emperors. And the irony, of course,
23:52
is that he is remembered by Christians as a man
23:54
who actually martyrs Christians,
23:57
who launches a persecution, even though I don't think he does.
24:01
But
24:04
that sense that
24:07
the laboring
24:11
that an emperor has to undertake, the tireless
24:13
work of communicating his ambitions
24:20
for the empire to all the many apparatchiks
24:22
who are scattered across the empire, I mean,
24:25
in enormous labour, I think Domitian
24:27
absolutely sees this as a kind of divinely
24:30
appointed task. That's
24:32
why I particularly enjoyed that
24:35
change of perspective. Again
24:39
we tend to see Roman
24:42
emperors as dictators, as power
24:46
hungry, as we've got this vast
24:48
empire now we can live high on the hog
24:50
and the arena is bread
24:52
and circus, it's just there to keep the people happy,
24:55
it's a very modern way of looking at it. And
24:57
I think you bring out the idea that actually
25:00
you might go, I'm in charge
25:02
of the known world, that's a great responsibility. Well
25:05
it clearly is and you can see this through Trajan's
25:08
letters to Pliny very
25:11
effectively that Pliny is out, he's
25:14
having his engagement to sort out drains and
25:16
dodgy aqueducts and all kinds of things and
25:19
he's endlessly writing to Trajan and Trajan's writing
25:21
matched him with great patience telling
25:23
him what he should do. And Trajan
25:26
is remembered
25:28
by the Romans as the best of emperors because he's a great
25:30
conqueror, but clearly he's not spending all his time conquering,
25:34
he's spending a lot of his time answering
25:36
inquiries from governors
25:40
out in obscure provinces. I mean I think that
25:42
there is a lot of blotter
25:46
doxing that an emperor has
25:48
to do. Yeah, absolutely.
25:50
So another area where I feel you offer a corrective
25:53
to the sort of Wikipedia
25:55
narrative that's out there is with
25:58
the Judean revolts. Or
26:00
as I think people would say, the Jewish revolt. Right.
26:04
It's difficult because in English we have both words,
26:07
Jewish and Judean. One
26:09
of them, of course, is associated with the Roman
26:11
province of Judea, and one of them isn't. One
26:13
of them is a word that can be applied to the
26:19
descendants of the Judeans right their way up to the present
26:21
day. And I think that the
26:24
word Jew in English has
26:28
the wrong signification.
26:31
Um,
26:34
it conjures up images of certainly
26:36
of rabbinical Judaism, which is simply
26:38
not around at this point, because
26:40
the focus of Judean occultic
26:45
practice is focused on the temple and
26:47
the temple is destroyed by Titus. I mean, this is
26:49
the key development
26:52
which sets Judeans
26:56
on the path to becoming, if you like, Jews and
27:00
sets the cultic practices of
27:02
the Judeans towards the road
27:05
where they can come to be called in the second
27:07
century by Christians Judaism. And
27:10
again, this is a very Christian
27:12
word. So again, there's the threat of importing
27:14
Christian as well as kind of modern
27:17
prejudices. But
27:20
I think that if you call them Judeans, then they come
27:22
to seem less, less
27:25
strange in the context of the Romans, because I think
27:27
we very much have a sense that the
27:30
Jews were destined
27:33
to engage in a kind of religious war
27:35
with the polytheistic Romans, that there was
27:37
something unique about the Jews
27:40
that made them unable to endure rule
27:42
by idol worshipers. But this isn't
27:44
true at all. The Judeans have been subject
27:47
to pagan
27:49
empires for centuries and centuries, the Romans,
27:51
the Greeks, the Persians, they've all done it. And sure, you
27:53
know, there's the Maccabean revolt,
27:56
but that's the exception that proves the rule for most of this period. period.
28:00
The Judeans have knuckled down, they paid their taxes,
28:03
they flourished and they flourished
28:06
under Rome. The Judeans are greeted with
28:08
great favour by the Roman provincial
28:11
authorities. The Romans side
28:13
with the Judeans
28:16
by and large against the Samaritans
28:18
for instance, against
28:21
other peoples who are the neighbours
28:23
of the Judeans. And
28:25
the Judeans have a cultic
28:29
temple, they have a metropolis, they have a homeland,
28:31
just like every other people. And although
28:34
of course the Romans do find
28:36
the Judeans weird, they have this single
28:39
god, they don't have statues
28:41
in their temples, all this kind of thing, I mean
28:43
they do find them weird, but they find everybody weird.
28:46
This is the whole point. Romans
28:51
are absolutely convinced that they have the proper
28:53
understanding of Roligio, that
28:55
their bonds with the gods are the only effective
28:58
ones and the proof of that is that they're the masters of the
29:00
world. And everyone else is
29:02
old, so the Judeans
29:03
only worship one god, but the
29:06
Egyptians worship gods with animal heads, the
29:09
Britons are busy sacrificing people in
29:11
bogs and oak glades and
29:13
Syrians are castrating themselves and roaming round,
29:16
dressing up as women. I mean very weird
29:18
behaviour by Roman standards, but they're,
29:21
you know, whatever. As long as
29:23
they pay their taxes, they
29:25
can do what they like. And really
29:27
what triggers the Judean Revolt is the fact that Judeans
29:30
don't want to pay their taxes because they're being
29:33
royally screwed by Nero, who
29:35
wants to fund the rebuilding of Rome after the Great
29:37
Fire. And there's a cascade
29:39
effect of contingent
29:42
accidents and episodes that
29:44
sees a kind of tax revolt get out of
29:46
hand, a Roman
29:48
garrison massacred, a legion destroyed.
29:51
And the further
29:54
the Judeans go into revolt,
29:56
the more devastating they know the reprisals
29:58
are going to be. And the more they
30:00
think, well, we might as well just, you know, just
30:03
carry on and hope that God is on our side.
30:07
And, you know, if
30:09
there are echoes of events
30:12
in the Middle East
30:14
at the moment in that. Well,
30:19
it's a reminder of the way in which the
30:23
events of
30:25
the first Judean Revolt, and then again, a second
30:28
a second revolt under Hadrian do,
30:31
of course, have cataclysmic
30:34
long term consequences for
30:38
the condition of the Middle East today, because
30:40
it's Titus
30:44
who destroys Jerusalem, wipes out the temple, but
30:47
it's Hadrian who there's
30:50
a Judean's rise
30:52
in revolt again. It's incredibly
30:55
brutal war and it's Hadrian who erases
30:57
the very name of Judea from the map and calls
31:00
it Palestine. And
31:04
so there's sort of been three revolts
31:07
during this period that you're covering.
31:10
And so by the end of it, Judean
31:12
communities are sort of scattered and their
31:15
homeland is sort of scourged. At
31:17
the same time, you detect
31:20
Hadrian beginning
31:22
a search for some kind
31:24
of unifying deity. Well,
31:28
I mean, Hadrian,
31:30
the Flavians, they're
31:32
spacing the Titus, never let anyone forget
31:34
about their success in suppressing the Judean Revolt.
31:37
And they cast it not as a revolt, but as a conquest. I
31:39
mean, absolutely shameless propaganda, because it was everyone
31:41
that days that Judea was
31:43
a province in rebellion rather than a kingdom that is
31:45
being conquered. But that's
31:48
Bayesian and Titus have to say that because
31:50
they want to celebrate a triumph and you can't celebrate
31:53
a triumph
31:55
if you're simply pacifying a rebellion.
31:58
And so they just go on and on.
31:59
on about it. They pretend
32:02
that the Coliseum is being funded by loot
32:04
taken from Jerusalem, whereas in fact it's being
32:06
paid for by Greek taxes, and
32:09
they're endlessly issuing coins boosting
32:11
about their conquest of Judea.
32:15
With Hadrian, I think it's powerfully
32:17
different because
32:21
he sees himself as both
32:25
the man who keeps
32:28
unwanted beggars from
32:31
the great garden of the world, so
32:34
hence Hadrian's Wall, hence wooden
32:36
palisades and dirt ramparts
32:39
that are built in other corners of the Empire.
32:42
But he also sees himself as responsible
32:45
for tending the
32:48
great garden that he sees as
32:51
his ruling. And so the Judean
32:53
Revolt, I think he does see as a kind of
32:55
failure. He's taken by surprise.
32:57
There'd been this low-level grumbling,
33:00
this insurgency that
33:02
had broken out under
33:05
Trajan into open warfare. Hadrian
33:08
had pacified it, and they were definitely
33:10
Judean leaders who thought that he might well
33:15
give them
33:16
the temple back and give them Jerusalem back.
33:18
Hadrian chooses not to do that, and this then
33:20
precipitates a kind of despairing,
33:23
desperate rebellion again
33:25
that involves deliberate self-conscious
33:28
atrocities against Roman rule, which then
33:31
of course just incites the Romans
33:33
to be even more brutal in their response. And
33:38
by the end of it, the
33:41
very name of Judea has been wiped out. Now
33:45
the Romans,
33:47
I think, assume that
33:49
the Judeans will go the way, say, of the Carthaginians.
33:52
The Carthaginian, you know, Carthage, likewise,
33:55
had been wiped from the face of the earth.
33:57
Carthaginian, Culphin?
33:59
practices had been shown no respect
34:02
whatsoever. And although
34:04
of course people continue to speak Punic in North
34:06
Africa, a Carthaginian
34:09
identity such as Hamelkar and
34:11
Hannibal had known it is indeed erased.
34:13
And I think the Romans assume that this is what will happen with
34:15
the Judeans. Of course it doesn't. And
34:18
this is what makes the Judeans in
34:20
the long run so distinctive
34:22
is that they have an alternative
34:25
focus for their identity
34:28
to the temple and to Jerusalem which
34:30
is the scriptures. And so this is where the
34:34
rabbis, the teachers, are
34:38
able to reconsecrate
34:41
Torah and the
34:43
practice of studying scripture
34:47
as an alternative focus of
34:49
piety. And they're able to do that because
34:52
there are teachers in Babylon who are beyond
34:54
the reach of Rome. But also
34:56
because there are teachers and Jewish
34:58
settlements in Galilee which
35:01
under Hadrian does not rise in rebellion so
35:03
the Romans leave them. And so it's
35:05
in Galilee in
35:07
Babylon that you have the progress
35:10
towards what will become the Talmud
35:13
which is defining
35:17
for Judaism as it will emerge over the course
35:19
of late antiquity.
35:21
And is there, am I mistaken, is there
35:23
any connection to Christianity there
35:26
then ending up becoming the Roman
35:28
religion? Because
35:30
I know there are sort of threads that Judeans
35:35
spreading out across the empire, some are
35:38
drawn to Christianity because it sort of has this connection
35:41
to... Well people,
35:44
the Romans, there are lots of Romans
35:46
who are drawn to Judean
35:49
teachings. And
35:52
I think you can see why because the
35:55
god of the Judeans is
35:59
a god for or a universal human
36:01
order because he has created all
36:04
of humanity in his own image. And so
36:06
that endows people who
36:08
come to believe in this God with
36:11
a dignity that they wouldn't otherwise have. And
36:15
Perpere Sabina herself is celebrated
36:19
as
36:20
someone who admires and respects the
36:22
Judean God. And we know this from Josephus who
36:25
reports it.
36:26
You know,
36:27
he had dealings with her when he came to Rome before the great
36:29
rebellion.
36:31
But obviously there's a problem, particularly
36:33
if you're a man, a Roman man, and
36:35
you want to identify with
36:38
Judean practice, which is that it
36:40
involves circumcision. And there are a lot of ways
36:43
to do that. But
36:45
Christianity kind of offers
36:47
a shortcut. You can have the Judean scriptures
36:49
and the universal God without having to be
36:52
circumcised. And I think that what happens
36:55
over the course of
36:57
the second
36:58
and third centuries,
37:00
particularly
37:04
after the Judean rebellions,
37:07
is that if
37:09
you like, the Judeans,
37:13
the Jews become the heirs of
37:16
the notion that
37:20
the God of Israel is specifically the God
37:22
of Israel. Whereas the Christians become the
37:25
heir of the idea that the God of Israel is also the God who
37:27
has created every man and woman.
37:30
And that is the process ultimately
37:32
of bifurcation.
37:35
But the key thing is that they are basically
37:38
siblings.
37:40
You know, they
37:42
are Esau and Jacob,
37:45
Romulus and Remus. I mean, this is how they're often compared in
37:49
late antiquity. In the long run, the idea
37:52
comes to be embedded that
37:54
Judaism is the mother and Christianity
37:57
is the daughter. But that's the process.
37:59
flattering to the conceit of both
38:02
because it enables Jews to cast
38:04
themselves as the primal
38:08
original way of understanding
38:10
God and Christians as kind of aberrant
38:13
whereas it enables Christians to cast themselves
38:15
as the guardians of a new covenant
38:18
that they superseded the
38:21
Jewish way of doing things so it's very flattering to both
38:23
but it's not true. I mean they are
38:25
siblings. Absolutely
38:28
and the book ends with
38:30
Hadrian's death and some
38:32
people might think
38:34
Pax, why not go on
38:36
into
38:37
Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius and
38:39
so on but I think you sort of identify
38:43
in Hadrian the sort of the glint in
38:45
the eye of what will become Byzantium that the
38:47
world will become Roman rather
38:49
than these provincial differences.
38:52
Well it's partly because I'm trying to
38:54
do it in the kind of the lifespan, a human
38:57
lifespan, a cyclum.
39:01
So you
39:03
know that someone born in
39:05
Nero's reign could live to see the death
39:07
of Hadrian.
39:11
It's also because I want
39:14
to keep stuff for the next one. Yes absolutely.
39:17
I didn't want to use it all up
39:20
but you're right I mean I think that Nero
39:23
and Hadrian are very complementary figures.
39:26
You know you have Judean revolts in the reigns
39:28
of both and both of course are obsessed
39:30
by Greece and
39:34
Hadrian does this much more successfully than Nero.
39:36
Nero pushes things too far, he kind of
39:38
poses as a tragic hero, he
39:43
gives total tax freedom, tax
39:45
exemption to the Greeks which just annoys everybody
39:47
else and his relationship
39:50
to Greece is something that definitely
39:52
precipitates the rebellion because it's while
39:54
he is away in Greece kind of
39:56
touring the festivals and racing the Olympic Games
39:59
that the rebellion start that in the long run
40:02
will topple him. Hadrian is much,
40:04
much more successful at this because
40:06
he institutes a
40:08
kind of Hellenic equivalent of the
40:11
European Union centered on Athens, but
40:13
he also very much favours Sparta and it's
40:15
this idea that Athens and Sparta and other
40:18
ancient rivals can be reconciled
40:21
into a single pan-Hellenion,
40:24
a Hellenic union. And
40:27
that the existence of this Hellenic
40:30
union will therefore redound to the
40:32
greater glory of Rome and of Hadrian because
40:34
he's the guy who's achieved it. And
40:39
I think that this
40:41
is obviously a development that
40:44
is pregnant with significance for
40:47
the future as you know. Your listeners
40:52
of all people will appreciate
40:55
that the Romans will
40:58
become the Romeoi, that they will be, they
41:01
will still think of themselves as Roman, but they will think
41:03
of themselves as Roman in Greek. And
41:06
in the, under Hadrian
41:09
you can see the kind of acorn
41:11
from which this will grow. Absolutely.
41:15
Fantastic. Let me ask you two non-Pax
41:17
questions before we
41:19
wrap up. Some listeners,
41:22
maybe one or two, may not realise you have your own
41:24
podcast now. The rest is history,
41:26
which you co-host with Dominic Sandbroek.
41:29
We could have talked about that for 40 minutes as well,
41:31
but why don't you just tease the listeners
41:34
with one topic you've covered on the show which surprised
41:37
you with how enjoyable it was to
41:40
research and learn about. I think the
41:43
Battle of Cofalga. I had a massive
41:45
animus against naval history because
41:47
I know nothing about the terms
41:50
and I'm very bored by, we always
41:52
used to go, I grew up in Salisbury and so we
41:54
always used to go on school trips to HMS Victory and
41:56
I found it terminally dull. I just
41:59
rode. Misson's, Mars, Sails,
42:02
whatever, I couldn't care less. And
42:07
we reached the stage where I thought we really should do something Napoleonic.
42:10
We hadn't done anything Napoleonic and the
42:12
anniversary of Trafalgar was coming up and I thought we
42:14
could just do a bit. I mean, how can it be? Just
42:17
tell the story in a bit. And I
42:20
had two weeks off and it was meant to be a
42:22
holiday from reading up on
42:24
subjects for the podcast. And I
42:26
read a book on Trafalgar and found it utterly gripping.
42:30
And I then became completely obsessed and
42:33
did nothing all holiday except read up about the
42:35
deep history of the Royal Navy. And
42:38
I
42:39
found it fascinating because, partly
42:41
because the battle itself is
42:44
an extraordinary, I mean, to
42:47
understand why it is, why
42:49
Nelson's tactics are so stunning, it's
42:52
really eye-opening. Nelson
42:55
himself is such a fascinating character. But
42:57
ultimately, I think I found it
42:59
eye-opening because
43:02
Nelson's victory at Trafalgar is rooted
43:04
in decades and indeed a century and a half
43:07
of British initiatives
43:16
that essentially are, in
43:18
the words of one historian, creating 19th
43:21
century islands in an 18th century
43:23
sea with the naval dockyards. These
43:26
are incubators of the Industrial Revolution, that
43:30
frameworks for resupplying ships are being developed
43:33
in the 1790s that will last right their way up
43:35
to the Falklands War. I mean, this is incredible.
43:38
And simultaneously, that to be on
43:40
a Royal Navy ship, it's
43:43
probably the healthiest place on the whole planet because
43:46
people are so concerned, not that
43:48
the crew don't succumb to disease, that
43:50
they're pushing initiatives in public health that
43:53
will, in the 19th century, apply
43:56
to cities, lead to the great revolution of which
43:58
we the beneficiaries in the 20th century. and 21st centuries.
44:01
So the sense that Trafalgar
44:05
is a battle in which the future is being displayed,
44:08
I found absolutely eye-opening and thrilling.
44:11
And I, not a naval history person,
44:13
but your description of the battle was
44:16
absolutely visceral. So that's incredible.
44:18
Yeah, I mean, the thing, you know, because the thing is that
44:21
normally in a
44:24
kind of Napoleonic era battle, and
44:27
long before ships just line up and kind of
44:29
fire at each other. And that's
44:31
it pretty much. Nelson's strategy is that you
44:33
have two prongs with a
44:35
ship at the tip of each prong, one of which is
44:38
his ship, Victory, and the other one is commanded by
44:40
Admiral Collingwood, who has a dog called Bounce,
44:43
Geordie, who goes around planting oaks when he's
44:45
not commanding ships, tremendous man. And
44:48
these guys, you know, the ships are getting
44:51
pulverised, and the officers
44:53
have to stand on the deck, and they're
44:56
not allowed to duck. I
44:58
cannot contemplate the courage that
45:01
would be required to do that. And
45:03
Nelson standing there and a cannonball screams
45:05
past and, you know, it's just a pair of
45:07
legs from the guy he's talking to, and they kind of
45:09
slowly keel over, and you know, the top
45:12
half is just vanished in a kind
45:14
of great smear of blood
45:16
and gunpowder. I mean, it's just
45:18
astonishing jaw-dropping stuff.
45:21
Do check out the rest of this history for more
45:24
audio. Final question just for me. Should
45:27
England have batted more sensibly in the first
45:29
Ashes test with Australia, or am I
45:31
a dinosaur who hasn't had my conversion
45:34
to Basbul yet? No, I think
45:36
that Basbul is tremendous.
45:38
I'm all in favour of it. It, I
45:41
mean, it's for me nothing to people, nothing about cricket. But
45:44
I think States' declaration while
45:47
tactically wrong was strategically correct.
45:49
Brilliant. Pax War
45:51
and Peace in Rome's Golden Age is out now
45:54
in the US and the UK and beyond,
45:56
I'm sure, in all good bookshops. Check
45:59
out the rest of history. read Dominion. Tom
46:01
Holland, thank you so much for coming back on the podcast.
46:03
Thank you very much for having me.
46:08
Just a reminder that if you'd like to listen to Pax
46:10
or any of Tom's other books, why not
46:13
sign up at audibletrial.com forward
46:15
slash Byzantium. That
46:17
will get you the book for free, along with a month-long
46:20
trial of Audible's service. If
46:22
you don't like it, you don't need to stay subscribed
46:24
and you can still listen
46:26
to the book features.
46:39
Did you know that personal information like
46:41
addresses and phone numbers is collected
46:43
and sold by data brokers across the internet?
46:46
Fortunately, Aura steps in, scanning
46:48
the web, sending you alerts, and requesting
46:51
the removal of your info when found. Get
46:53
a 14-day free trial of Aura's full
46:56
toolkit, including ID theft protection,
46:58
parental controls, and more at aura.com
47:02
slash safety. That's A-U-R-A
47:05
dot com slash safety.
47:09
EK's
47:11
powers the world's best practice. Here's
47:14
a show that we recommend. Welcome
47:18
to Everybody in the Pool, the podcast
47:20
that dives deep into the climate crisis and
47:22
comes up with solutions that work. I'm
47:25
Molly Woods. With this
47:27
show, I'm excited to bring you conversations
47:29
with startup innovators, business leaders,
47:32
policymakers, and everyday people
47:34
doing their best to solve the biggest challenge
47:37
of our time. We're trying to make hydrogen
47:39
commercial aviation a near-term reality.
47:41
If you eat a vegan diet, if you
47:44
reduce your green gas emissions
47:46
to 75% with every
47:48
meal. The whole reason why I started
47:50
Nest was because of climate change. Join
47:53
me every week for inspiring stories, practical
47:55
advice, and a healthy dose of optimism.
47:58
So come on in.
47:59
water's fine. Acast
48:02
helps creators launch, grow, and
48:05
monetize their podcasts everywhere. Acast.com
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More