Podchaser Logo
Home
Episode 276 - Pax: War and Peace in Rome's Golden Age with Tom Holland

Episode 276 - Pax: War and Peace in Rome's Golden Age with Tom Holland

Released Thursday, 19th October 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Episode 276 - Pax: War and Peace in Rome's Golden Age with Tom Holland

Episode 276 - Pax: War and Peace in Rome's Golden Age with Tom Holland

Episode 276 - Pax: War and Peace in Rome's Golden Age with Tom Holland

Episode 276 - Pax: War and Peace in Rome's Golden Age with Tom Holland

Thursday, 19th October 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

If you're listening to this podcast, you

0:02

must recognize the value of asking questions.

0:04

At Aramco, our questions

0:06

help us engineer a better future. How

0:09

can today's resources fuel our shared

0:11

tomorrow? How can we deliver energy

0:14

to a world that can't stop? How

0:16

can we deliver one of the fuels of the future? How

0:19

can we sow curiosity to harvest

0:21

ingenuity?

0:23

To learn more about how innovation drives us

0:25

forward, visit aramco.com slash

0:27

poweredbyhow.

0:30

Have you ever Googled your own name? Prepare

0:32

for a shock because your personal info, including

0:34

addresses and phone numbers, is all out

0:36

there. It's all harvested by data brokers

0:39

and sold legally. Aura

0:41

is a personal digital security service that scans

0:43

the internet for your sensitive information and

0:45

provides a full suite of privacy-enhancing tools.

0:48

For a limited time, Aura is offering listeners a

0:50

14-day free trial at aura.com

0:53

slash safety. That's A-U-R-A

0:55

dot com slash safety to learn more

0:58

and activate the 14-day trial period.

1:10

Hello everyone and welcome to the History

1:13

of Byzantium, episode 276,

1:15

Pax, War and Peace in

1:19

Rome's Golden Age, with Tom

1:22

Holland. I

1:25

imagine for many of you, Tom Holland requires

1:27

no introduction, but just in case,

1:30

he is a London-based historian who has now

1:33

written three books covering Roman

1:35

history.

1:36

He's also written books about the first

1:38

millennium, the Greco-Persian war,

1:41

as well as two particularly groundbreaking

1:43

books about religion.

1:45

The first, In the Shadow of the Sword,

1:48

was the subject of an interview on this podcast

1:50

back in 2014 when we

1:52

were covering the origins of Islam.

1:55

Recently he wrote a book called

1:57

Dominion, where he charted the influence

1:59

of Christianism. Christianity, from its capture

2:01

of the Romans all the way to modern

2:03

times. If that sounds

2:06

at all dry, believe me, it

2:08

is the opposite. It is an exhilarating

2:10

argument that essentially beginning with the Crusades,

2:13

Western Christianity set itself on the path

2:16

towards the Enlightenment, science,

2:18

atheism, and perhaps even

2:21

woe. Tom

2:23

Holland is such a fascinating writer. He

2:25

has the skill I so admire in the best

2:27

historians I've read of taking you back

2:30

into the mindset of earlier people,

2:33

stripping away or perhaps putting back

2:35

on layers of meaning which we've

2:37

missed out on. His

2:40

first Romans-only book, Rubicon,

2:42

covered the fall of the Republic, his

2:44

second, Dynasty, took the story from Julius

2:46

Caesar's death to that of Nero, and

2:49

his latest book, Pax, takes

2:51

us up to the death of Hadrian. I

2:55

imagine that, like me, you

2:57

all know the story of this period pretty well.

3:00

It's Tom's great skill to tell the story in a way

3:03

that brings out insights which you didn't realise

3:05

were there to be drawn out, and that's

3:07

what I talk to him about in today's interview.

3:11

Tom's books are available everywhere good books are

3:13

sold, but if you'd like to listen to one,

3:16

then why not try Audible? Audible's

3:19

massive collection of books and podcasts probably

3:21

needs no introduction either, but

3:23

you could listen to Pax for free if

3:26

you sign up at audibletrial.com forward

3:28

slash Byzantium. In

3:30

the past, Tom has delegated the reading

3:33

of these books to voice actors, but for Pax,

3:36

he does the talking himself, and

3:38

I know that will be a selling point to those of you who

3:40

are now hooked on Tom's podcast, The

3:43

Rest is History. I'll

3:45

repeat that Audible offer at the end of the show, but

3:47

for now, here's the interview.

4:00

are now the busiest man in history

4:02

and podcasting. We are incredibly grateful

4:05

for your time. We last spoke

4:08

in 2014 when I was covering

4:10

the origins of Islam and since

4:12

then you've written Dynasty, Rise

4:15

and Fall of the House of Caesar, covering

4:17

Caesar's death to Nero's death,

4:20

and now you've written Pax, War

4:22

and Peace in Rome's Golden Age, taking us from Nero's

4:24

death to that of Hadrian in 138 AD, and that's

4:27

obviously what we'll be talking about today. But

4:30

I wanted to start by asking about the

4:32

book you wrote in between those two, Dominion,

4:36

The Making of the Western Mind, or perhaps more

4:38

revealingly the American subtitle, How the Christian

4:40

Revolution Remade the World. I

4:43

can't recommend Dominion highly enough to

4:45

those listening. It's one of the most mind-blowing

4:48

history books I've ever read. You know,

4:51

I'm loving this already. This

4:53

is going so well. I mean

4:56

we could think of it. I could just talk about that for now, but

4:58

just keep on with the play. One

5:01

of the points you made in that book is that people,

5:04

particularly in the West today, are so saturated

5:07

in Christian ideas that it's very hard

5:09

to fathom how different the moral

5:11

universe of people in the pre-Christian

5:14

past was, and you begin Pax

5:16

by saying the Romans of that period

5:19

were compellingly different

5:21

to us. So am I right in seeing

5:23

the influence of Dominion on how you approached

5:26

this period of Roman history? Yeah,

5:28

so the

5:32

period that I'm covering, obviously Christians

5:35

are there, but as I say in the introduction,

5:37

they are like tiny shrews

5:40

scampering around a Mesozoic ecosystem,

5:43

and in the long run the mammals

5:46

will inherit the earth, but at the moment I'm

5:48

interested in the dinosaurs. Well

5:51

I wanted to get into that. How do you

5:54

approach

5:56

understanding of pre-Christian people?

5:59

Or maybe I should say

5:59

pre-secular

6:01

people because I think we

6:03

really struggle to understand how the

6:07

divine influenced

6:09

people because we've created this separation

6:12

from it. So I think that, and

6:15

this is a conclusion I've come to over many,

6:17

many years, but it's one that's always nagged

6:19

at me and it now pretty much obsesses

6:22

me, that there is

6:24

a flaw with the

6:27

methodology of academic

6:30

scholarship in the 21st century. I

6:32

mean, it's achieved so much, we couldn't look at

6:34

the past without it, and yet there are

6:36

certain costs. And one of the problems

6:39

is that in its fundamentals,

6:42

it's very, very materialist. And

6:46

the past was not a materialist world. People

6:50

did not have materialist attitudes. People

6:52

believed that the world was

6:55

full of gods, that the interface of

6:58

the supernatural and the natural was

7:00

so profound that it barely made

7:02

any sense to distinguish them. And

7:05

I think that that is true, say, of

7:10

the Christian centuries of the Middle

7:12

Ages and of late antiquity. But

7:15

at least we are very much

7:17

the heirs of that way of thinking.

7:20

So to go back to a world where you not

7:23

only have to smear away the kind of the materialist

7:25

assumptions, but you also have to smear

7:27

away the Christian presumptions is really

7:30

difficult, because it's

7:32

the nature of assumptions that you tend not to recognize that you

7:34

have them. I'm

7:37

sure lots of people who

7:39

write about antiquity,

7:41

and I was certainly one of them. And

7:44

this was kind of focused for me by the book that you mentioned at

7:46

the start of this, Shadow of the Sword.

7:49

I felt that I was in writing that, that I was being

7:51

objective and neutral in

7:53

looking at the various ways

7:55

that Jews and Zoroastrians

7:57

and Christians and Muslims understood the mention

8:00

of the supernatural. But of course, I wasn't at all.

8:02

And specifically with Islam, the

8:05

the assumption I brought to looking

8:08

at the life of Muhammad and the historicity

8:10

of the Quran and the origins of the Quran

8:14

were deeply materialist. So I wasn't

8:17

being neutral at all. It's perfectly

8:19

possible to explain the origins of Islam as

8:21

Muslims have always done as an intrusion of the

8:23

divine into the fabric of the

8:25

mortal and the earthly. But I wasn't going to do

8:27

that. That doesn't make me neutral. So

8:31

with the Romans, you have to try and

8:34

come to terms with their understanding of

8:36

the divine. You have to get rid of your material

8:38

assumptions, you have to get rid of your Christian assumptions. And

8:40

both of them are so, we

8:43

are so marinated in them that it's, I

8:45

think, very difficult to do that. You

8:47

have to make a conscious effort, I think.

8:50

Well,

8:51

let's talk about this unnervingly

8:54

different culture with

8:57

an example that was quite unfamiliar

8:59

to me. I had forgotten this from that

9:01

earlier period of Roman history. So I suspect some

9:03

listeners will too, which

9:06

is the tale of Sporus. Could

9:09

you remind the listeners of this? Because I think this is probably

9:11

the most unnerving story

9:14

from the book. So if any of your listeners have watched Succession,

9:19

they may have picked up on this story because Tom

9:22

Wamsgams is always citing

9:24

it to cousin Greg. And I can

9:26

claim personal responsibility for that. I was

9:28

the Julia Claudian advisor. I

9:31

went in and talked to the writers before they

9:33

began working on the script for

9:35

Succession. Fantastic. So very

9:38

proud of that. It is a terrible

9:40

story. And to be fair, it was seen as

9:42

a pretty terrible story by

9:45

the Romans themselves. It was seen as a marker of Nero's

9:47

depravity. Because of course, whenever

9:49

there's some shocking story, you can be sure that Nero

9:52

isn't far away from it. So

9:55

Nero's, the great love of Nero's

9:58

life was a woman called Papaya Sabanc. who

10:00

had amber colored hair, had her own

10:02

cosmetics range. She

10:05

was the one who bathed in acid milk, not Cleopatra.

10:09

Long before Peat Town's end, she said, I hope

10:11

I die before I get old. So she was very,

10:13

she was unbelievably sophisticated.

10:16

Nero, a daughter. The

10:18

story, the gossip

10:20

is that Nero comes home from

10:23

the races one day. Papaya

10:25

is heavily pregnant with Nero's son,

10:27

maybe son, maybe daughter we don't know,

10:29

but Nero, I think, assumed it was a son. She

10:32

snaps at him, he kicks her in the stomach and she dies, and

10:34

the baby dies as well. We

10:36

have no way of knowing if that story is true. I personally

10:39

doubt it. It's a commentary on how

10:42

the Romans saw Nero. But

10:45

certainly there's no doubt in the Titanic scale

10:47

of Nero's grief, and

10:49

he gives Papaya a sensational send-off,

10:52

full funeral in the Forum. She's

10:54

mummified, laid to rest in the Mausoleum

10:56

of Augustus. The full work

10:58

of Nero incinerates a

11:00

vast quantity of incense in her honor.

11:03

And he goes on to marry

11:05

another woman who's rather like Papaya, kind

11:08

of aristocratic, sophisticated, smart,

11:10

clearly Nero's type. But

11:13

the story goes that Nero misses

11:18

the physicality of someone who looks like

11:20

Papaya. And so he sends scouts out

11:23

across the Empire looking for someone, and

11:25

the scouts duly find someone. The

11:27

twist is that this person is not

11:30

a female but a male, very

11:32

young boy. He's castrated,

11:35

Nero christens him. It doesn't christen him, obviously,

11:38

because he's not president. Now you see the importation of

11:40

Christian prejudices. He calls

11:42

him Sporus, which is a grim,

11:45

Neronian joke, because Sporus in Greek is

11:47

spunk. And of course Sporus

11:49

no longer has any spunk. But

11:52

principally, this poor boy girl

11:56

is called Papaya, because from this

11:58

point on, he, she, is Christian. treated as

12:00

being papaya, where's the hair,

12:03

cosmetics, dress, everything

12:06

to look like papaya. And

12:10

in due course when Nero kills

12:13

himself, papaya,

12:16

Sporis, is there and

12:18

does the mourning over his body as a bereaved

12:22

wife should, gets picked

12:24

up as a trophy of war by the commander of the Praetorians

12:27

who's betrayed Nero. He gets

12:29

overambitious, gets killed

12:33

and papaya Sporis

12:35

gets picked up by Oso

12:38

who had actually been married to

12:40

the original papaya before Nero

12:43

kind of appropriated her.

12:47

So for Oso it must have been very

12:49

odd, you know suddenly sleeping

12:52

with someone who looks like his dead wife. Oso

12:55

of course then succumbs

12:58

in his legions defeated,

13:00

he commits suicide rather nobly rather

13:02

than carry on a civil war and

13:04

so Sporis becomes the property of Vitellius,

13:07

the pie-loving

13:11

commander of the German legions who becomes

13:14

the third of the three emperors in the year of the four

13:16

emperors. So Vitellius

13:18

thinks that by this point Sporis

13:20

is clearly soiled goods, doesn't want him,

13:23

her. So decides that

13:25

he will show

13:27

the Roman people what a great guy he is by staging

13:30

an incredible entertainment which

13:32

involves dressing Sporis

13:35

up as a plesipina and

13:38

dressing up a load of gadiators as

13:42

Pluto and having Sporis

13:45

gang-raped to death in the arena and

13:47

at this point unsurprisingly the poor boy kills

13:49

himself and the

13:51

thing I think that

13:55

is most startling about

13:58

that is that

13:59

Thalleus thought this was a way to show what a great

14:02

guy he was. I mean, there's a chasm

14:04

of difference from us than that.

14:10

Nero, what Nero is doing

14:13

by

14:14

creating this similar acrum of a woman,

14:17

to the degree that he offers large amounts of money

14:19

to doctors who could implant

14:21

a womb in Sporas's body,

14:25

is that he is pushing to the limits a

14:28

sexual trend among the Roman elite

14:31

and pushing

14:34

it to excess, as Nero does with

14:36

almost everything. Because the

14:38

great craze among the

14:40

Roman elite is for boys who look like

14:43

girls. And delicati

14:45

they're called, pretty boys. And their

14:48

hair is conferred and teased

14:50

and crimped and permed and they

14:52

wear cosmetics and silks and all this kind

14:55

of thing. And the

14:59

more of a delicatus the slave

15:01

boy is, the more valuable

15:03

he is. And

15:06

Nero is just pushing this trend to an absolute

15:08

limit that no one will ever rival. And

15:10

it's very, very, in that way, very Nero behaviour.

15:14

I was going to say, and I think people

15:16

have to read the book to see the way you manfully

15:20

explain what

15:23

we would see as Peter

15:26

Phillip behaviour or what have you. Well it is Peter

15:28

Phillip behaviour. And

15:31

to our way of thinking it's entirely shocking. It's

15:33

child abuse, it involves

15:37

slavery, it's

15:39

shocking by our standards. But

15:43

you can acknowledge the shock that you feel as someone

15:46

in the 21st century. But

15:49

that of course, provokes the question,

15:51

well why do I feel this sense of shock? Where has this sense

15:53

of shock come from? Where has the process of cultural

15:55

dislocation happened? Because clearly to

15:57

the Romans it was more than acceptable.

15:59

And

16:00

why do you think Vitellius thinks people

16:03

will enjoy

16:05

that spectacle?

16:07

Because it's the job of Caesar

16:10

to entertain the people with

16:12

edifying spectacles. And

16:16

Vitellius, although he had been a friend of Nero's,

16:18

is concerned,

16:21

I think, to, to

16:24

market himself as a

16:26

rough, tough, bluff military man,

16:29

because he's very much a person of size.

16:32

And I think he wants to market him his size

16:34

as being military bulk, rather

16:36

than the kind of epicine folds

16:39

of fat, which is in the long

16:41

run, how he'll come to be interpreted. And

16:44

I think that by

16:47

by having

16:53

this eunuch who had gone

16:55

to bed with Othe who he has displaced,

16:58

saying, no, you know, this is, this is

17:02

grotesque behavior, this, you know, this is a

17:04

grotesque who is stained

17:06

by the attentions of all the

17:08

men who have gone before. And it's disgusting

17:11

that Othe would have slept with someone who'd also slept with a

17:13

praetorian in Nero. He

17:15

is trying to cast himself as a

17:17

kind of arbiter of morality. And,

17:20

you know, the Romans

17:22

obviously didn't think that inflicting

17:26

atrocities on people in

17:28

the arena was in any way immoral. Quite

17:30

the contrary, they thought it was very moral. And

17:33

they tended to have the assumption that

17:36

the spectacles that were staged

17:38

in the in the arena were

17:41

an illustration of how the Romans were absolutely

17:44

the most moral people on the face of

17:46

the earth. And unless you get that,

17:49

you don't you can't possibly begin

17:51

to see the world through Roman eyes and understand

17:54

the world that they're inhabiting. Absolutely.

17:56

Well, I, you know, this is why

17:58

I encourage people to read the book. because it's

18:01

peeling back layers or putting layers back on

18:03

perhaps. Yeah, I think so, yeah. Yeah,

18:06

so I mean listeners will be

18:08

pretty familiar with the outline of the narrative,

18:11

the year of the four emperors, the rise of Vespasian,

18:16

followed by after his dynasty, the

18:18

so-called five good emperors taking

18:21

power. This is obviously Pax,

18:24

this is the golden age of the Roman Empire as

18:27

Edward Given has framed it. And

18:29

we might think that the Romans

18:31

of this period would be saying things like

18:34

it was 1990. This is the end

18:36

of history, this is an empire on

18:39

which the sun will never set. But actually throughout

18:42

the book, you sense

18:45

anxiety, fear, a lot of

18:47

worry about this

18:49

situation from Roman thinkers. Well,

18:52

in the year of the four emperors,

18:54

there is fighting on the streets of Rome.

18:56

The Tepotelius ultimately is toppled

18:59

by the troops of Vespasian, Vespasian's

19:01

dynasty, the Flavian, so Flavian troops. And

19:04

he ends up sliced to pieces on

19:06

the Gomonian steps. And

19:10

the spectacle

19:13

of this year, when the peace that

19:15

people assumed had been

19:18

secured by the

19:20

divine Augustus, dissolved

19:22

away, and

19:26

it seemed like provinces would collapse and crumble

19:29

away and the entire order of the Roman

19:31

world melt away. And since the

19:34

order of the Roman world had been blessed by the gods, it

19:36

suggested that the gods were angry with the

19:38

whole of humanity and who knew what would

19:40

happen. These

19:42

are very vivid fears that

19:45

people across the empire feel. And

19:48

the great spectacle of

19:50

reconstruction is something that Vespasian

19:53

takes incredibly seriously. But

19:55

there are markers

19:58

that particularly

20:00

Buffett the Roman world in

20:02

the wake of Vespasian's death in 79 so

20:06

the rule of his elder son Titus that

20:10

seemed palpably

20:12

to signal the anger of the gods

20:15

so the holiest

20:17

building in Rome, the

20:19

Temple of Jupiter on the capital burns

20:21

down for the second time in a decade there's

20:25

a terrible plague and of course

20:27

most notoriously there's the eruption of Vesuvius

20:30

and Vesuvius entombed the cities

20:33

of Pompeii and Herculaneum which means that

20:35

the funeral rites can't be performed for

20:37

all the dead in those two cities so

20:40

their ghosts have to be assumed to be wandering

20:43

the Bay of Naples the ash

20:46

that is spewed out by Vesuvius it

20:50

lingers along in the air causing

20:53

weird celestial phenomena

20:57

strange sunsets as far as Syria so

21:00

it absolutely seems like the gods

21:04

are angry with the Roman people and

21:06

a religio

21:09

to a Roman I mean

21:13

it's the Latin word from which our

21:15

word religion derives but it should not absolutely

21:18

not be translated as religion a religio is

21:21

a bond that joins humanity

21:24

to the gods and it's a kind of obligation

21:27

that is paid say whether it's a priesthood or

21:29

a festival or some form of celebration

21:32

and it's a kind of down payment, it's a kind of insurance

21:35

so if things are going wrong you know that you

21:37

haven't your

21:39

insurance is running down and you need to start

21:42

re-establishing those religio-nes and

21:44

I think that that is what Titus is doing with

21:47

the Colosseum the inauguration

21:49

of the Colosseum is an attempt

21:54

to offer up morally

21:56

edifying lessons to the Roman people

21:58

who are now the Colosseum should be

22:00

understood as a great census in stone, an

22:04

ordering of the Roman people as they should be properly

22:07

ordered, but also something

22:09

that will be pleasing to the gods. But

22:12

the person who really takes this mission on board,

22:14

I think, is Titus' younger brother, Domitian, who

22:16

succeeds in Titus' dying after

22:18

a very short reign. And Domitian is,

22:22

he has a terrible reputation,

22:25

he was clearly a very charmless man. He is

22:27

the first emperor to unapologetically

22:29

refer to himself as Dominus' Lord

22:32

Master, which was a title that Augustus

22:34

had very pointedly refused. But

22:36

Domitian embraces it, and I think he embraces

22:39

it because he feels that

22:41

that's exactly what it is, that he has been entrusted

22:44

by the gods with the great mission

22:46

of restoring the Roman people

22:49

to their favour, and he does it in all kinds

22:51

of ways. So he

22:54

attempts to stabilise the currency,

22:56

he attempts to stabilise the frontier,

22:59

he attempts to reform morals, he

23:02

is micromanaging every

23:04

expression of obligation

23:06

to the gods, and he feels

23:09

that, I think, he

23:11

is the deputy

23:15

of the heavens. And this is

23:18

a podcast about Byzantium, not about pre-Christian

23:22

Rome. But I do, the

23:24

thing that Domitian reminds

23:26

me of is a particularly

23:28

autocratic Christian emperor, an

23:31

emperor who has the utmost conviction

23:34

that he is responsible for the heavens,

23:36

for the moral guidance of the

23:38

Roman world. But of course

23:41

Domitian lacks the theological

23:45

heft that Christianity will come

23:47

to provide the Byzantine

23:50

emperors. And the irony, of course,

23:52

is that he is remembered by Christians as a man

23:54

who actually martyrs Christians,

23:57

who launches a persecution, even though I don't think he does.

24:01

But

24:04

that sense that

24:07

the laboring

24:11

that an emperor has to undertake, the tireless

24:13

work of communicating his ambitions

24:20

for the empire to all the many apparatchiks

24:22

who are scattered across the empire, I mean,

24:25

in enormous labour, I think Domitian

24:27

absolutely sees this as a kind of divinely

24:30

appointed task. That's

24:32

why I particularly enjoyed that

24:35

change of perspective. Again

24:39

we tend to see Roman

24:42

emperors as dictators, as power

24:46

hungry, as we've got this vast

24:48

empire now we can live high on the hog

24:50

and the arena is bread

24:52

and circus, it's just there to keep the people happy,

24:55

it's a very modern way of looking at it. And

24:57

I think you bring out the idea that actually

25:00

you might go, I'm in charge

25:02

of the known world, that's a great responsibility. Well

25:05

it clearly is and you can see this through Trajan's

25:08

letters to Pliny very

25:11

effectively that Pliny is out, he's

25:14

having his engagement to sort out drains and

25:16

dodgy aqueducts and all kinds of things and

25:19

he's endlessly writing to Trajan and Trajan's writing

25:21

matched him with great patience telling

25:23

him what he should do. And Trajan

25:26

is remembered

25:28

by the Romans as the best of emperors because he's a great

25:30

conqueror, but clearly he's not spending all his time conquering,

25:34

he's spending a lot of his time answering

25:36

inquiries from governors

25:40

out in obscure provinces. I mean I think that

25:42

there is a lot of blotter

25:46

doxing that an emperor has

25:48

to do. Yeah, absolutely.

25:50

So another area where I feel you offer a corrective

25:53

to the sort of Wikipedia

25:55

narrative that's out there is with

25:58

the Judean revolts. Or

26:00

as I think people would say, the Jewish revolt. Right.

26:04

It's difficult because in English we have both words,

26:07

Jewish and Judean. One

26:09

of them, of course, is associated with the Roman

26:11

province of Judea, and one of them isn't. One

26:13

of them is a word that can be applied to the

26:19

descendants of the Judeans right their way up to the present

26:21

day. And I think that the

26:24

word Jew in English has

26:28

the wrong signification.

26:31

Um,

26:34

it conjures up images of certainly

26:36

of rabbinical Judaism, which is simply

26:38

not around at this point, because

26:40

the focus of Judean occultic

26:45

practice is focused on the temple and

26:47

the temple is destroyed by Titus. I mean, this is

26:49

the key development

26:52

which sets Judeans

26:56

on the path to becoming, if you like, Jews and

27:00

sets the cultic practices of

27:02

the Judeans towards the road

27:05

where they can come to be called in the second

27:07

century by Christians Judaism. And

27:10

again, this is a very Christian

27:12

word. So again, there's the threat of importing

27:14

Christian as well as kind of modern

27:17

prejudices. But

27:20

I think that if you call them Judeans, then they come

27:22

to seem less, less

27:25

strange in the context of the Romans, because I think

27:27

we very much have a sense that the

27:30

Jews were destined

27:33

to engage in a kind of religious war

27:35

with the polytheistic Romans, that there was

27:37

something unique about the Jews

27:40

that made them unable to endure rule

27:42

by idol worshipers. But this isn't

27:44

true at all. The Judeans have been subject

27:47

to pagan

27:49

empires for centuries and centuries, the Romans,

27:51

the Greeks, the Persians, they've all done it. And sure, you

27:53

know, there's the Maccabean revolt,

27:56

but that's the exception that proves the rule for most of this period. period.

28:00

The Judeans have knuckled down, they paid their taxes,

28:03

they flourished and they flourished

28:06

under Rome. The Judeans are greeted with

28:08

great favour by the Roman provincial

28:11

authorities. The Romans side

28:13

with the Judeans

28:16

by and large against the Samaritans

28:18

for instance, against

28:21

other peoples who are the neighbours

28:23

of the Judeans. And

28:25

the Judeans have a cultic

28:29

temple, they have a metropolis, they have a homeland,

28:31

just like every other people. And although

28:34

of course the Romans do find

28:36

the Judeans weird, they have this single

28:39

god, they don't have statues

28:41

in their temples, all this kind of thing, I mean

28:43

they do find them weird, but they find everybody weird.

28:46

This is the whole point. Romans

28:51

are absolutely convinced that they have the proper

28:53

understanding of Roligio, that

28:55

their bonds with the gods are the only effective

28:58

ones and the proof of that is that they're the masters of the

29:00

world. And everyone else is

29:02

old, so the Judeans

29:03

only worship one god, but the

29:06

Egyptians worship gods with animal heads, the

29:09

Britons are busy sacrificing people in

29:11

bogs and oak glades and

29:13

Syrians are castrating themselves and roaming round,

29:16

dressing up as women. I mean very weird

29:18

behaviour by Roman standards, but they're,

29:21

you know, whatever. As long as

29:23

they pay their taxes, they

29:25

can do what they like. And really

29:27

what triggers the Judean Revolt is the fact that Judeans

29:30

don't want to pay their taxes because they're being

29:33

royally screwed by Nero, who

29:35

wants to fund the rebuilding of Rome after the Great

29:37

Fire. And there's a cascade

29:39

effect of contingent

29:42

accidents and episodes that

29:44

sees a kind of tax revolt get out of

29:46

hand, a Roman

29:48

garrison massacred, a legion destroyed.

29:51

And the further

29:54

the Judeans go into revolt,

29:56

the more devastating they know the reprisals

29:58

are going to be. And the more they

30:00

think, well, we might as well just, you know, just

30:03

carry on and hope that God is on our side.

30:07

And, you know, if

30:09

there are echoes of events

30:12

in the Middle East

30:14

at the moment in that. Well,

30:19

it's a reminder of the way in which the

30:23

events of

30:25

the first Judean Revolt, and then again, a second

30:28

a second revolt under Hadrian do,

30:31

of course, have cataclysmic

30:34

long term consequences for

30:38

the condition of the Middle East today, because

30:40

it's Titus

30:44

who destroys Jerusalem, wipes out the temple, but

30:47

it's Hadrian who there's

30:50

a Judean's rise

30:52

in revolt again. It's incredibly

30:55

brutal war and it's Hadrian who erases

30:57

the very name of Judea from the map and calls

31:00

it Palestine. And

31:04

so there's sort of been three revolts

31:07

during this period that you're covering.

31:10

And so by the end of it, Judean

31:12

communities are sort of scattered and their

31:15

homeland is sort of scourged. At

31:17

the same time, you detect

31:20

Hadrian beginning

31:22

a search for some kind

31:24

of unifying deity. Well,

31:28

I mean, Hadrian,

31:30

the Flavians, they're

31:32

spacing the Titus, never let anyone forget

31:34

about their success in suppressing the Judean Revolt.

31:37

And they cast it not as a revolt, but as a conquest. I

31:39

mean, absolutely shameless propaganda, because it was everyone

31:41

that days that Judea was

31:43

a province in rebellion rather than a kingdom that is

31:45

being conquered. But that's

31:48

Bayesian and Titus have to say that because

31:50

they want to celebrate a triumph and you can't celebrate

31:53

a triumph

31:55

if you're simply pacifying a rebellion.

31:58

And so they just go on and on.

31:59

on about it. They pretend

32:02

that the Coliseum is being funded by loot

32:04

taken from Jerusalem, whereas in fact it's being

32:06

paid for by Greek taxes, and

32:09

they're endlessly issuing coins boosting

32:11

about their conquest of Judea.

32:15

With Hadrian, I think it's powerfully

32:17

different because

32:21

he sees himself as both

32:25

the man who keeps

32:28

unwanted beggars from

32:31

the great garden of the world, so

32:34

hence Hadrian's Wall, hence wooden

32:36

palisades and dirt ramparts

32:39

that are built in other corners of the Empire.

32:42

But he also sees himself as responsible

32:45

for tending the

32:48

great garden that he sees as

32:51

his ruling. And so the Judean

32:53

Revolt, I think he does see as a kind of

32:55

failure. He's taken by surprise.

32:57

There'd been this low-level grumbling,

33:00

this insurgency that

33:02

had broken out under

33:05

Trajan into open warfare. Hadrian

33:08

had pacified it, and they were definitely

33:10

Judean leaders who thought that he might well

33:15

give them

33:16

the temple back and give them Jerusalem back.

33:18

Hadrian chooses not to do that, and this then

33:20

precipitates a kind of despairing,

33:23

desperate rebellion again

33:25

that involves deliberate self-conscious

33:28

atrocities against Roman rule, which then

33:31

of course just incites the Romans

33:33

to be even more brutal in their response. And

33:38

by the end of it, the

33:41

very name of Judea has been wiped out. Now

33:45

the Romans,

33:47

I think, assume that

33:49

the Judeans will go the way, say, of the Carthaginians.

33:52

The Carthaginian, you know, Carthage, likewise,

33:55

had been wiped from the face of the earth.

33:57

Carthaginian, Culphin?

33:59

practices had been shown no respect

34:02

whatsoever. And although

34:04

of course people continue to speak Punic in North

34:06

Africa, a Carthaginian

34:09

identity such as Hamelkar and

34:11

Hannibal had known it is indeed erased.

34:13

And I think the Romans assume that this is what will happen with

34:15

the Judeans. Of course it doesn't. And

34:18

this is what makes the Judeans in

34:20

the long run so distinctive

34:22

is that they have an alternative

34:25

focus for their identity

34:28

to the temple and to Jerusalem which

34:30

is the scriptures. And so this is where the

34:34

rabbis, the teachers, are

34:38

able to reconsecrate

34:41

Torah and the

34:43

practice of studying scripture

34:47

as an alternative focus of

34:49

piety. And they're able to do that because

34:52

there are teachers in Babylon who are beyond

34:54

the reach of Rome. But also

34:56

because there are teachers and Jewish

34:58

settlements in Galilee which

35:01

under Hadrian does not rise in rebellion so

35:03

the Romans leave them. And so it's

35:05

in Galilee in

35:07

Babylon that you have the progress

35:10

towards what will become the Talmud

35:13

which is defining

35:17

for Judaism as it will emerge over the course

35:19

of late antiquity.

35:21

And is there, am I mistaken, is there

35:23

any connection to Christianity there

35:26

then ending up becoming the Roman

35:28

religion? Because

35:30

I know there are sort of threads that Judeans

35:35

spreading out across the empire, some are

35:38

drawn to Christianity because it sort of has this connection

35:41

to... Well people,

35:44

the Romans, there are lots of Romans

35:46

who are drawn to Judean

35:49

teachings. And

35:52

I think you can see why because the

35:55

god of the Judeans is

35:59

a god for or a universal human

36:01

order because he has created all

36:04

of humanity in his own image. And so

36:06

that endows people who

36:08

come to believe in this God with

36:11

a dignity that they wouldn't otherwise have. And

36:15

Perpere Sabina herself is celebrated

36:19

as

36:20

someone who admires and respects the

36:22

Judean God. And we know this from Josephus who

36:25

reports it.

36:26

You know,

36:27

he had dealings with her when he came to Rome before the great

36:29

rebellion.

36:31

But obviously there's a problem, particularly

36:33

if you're a man, a Roman man, and

36:35

you want to identify with

36:38

Judean practice, which is that it

36:40

involves circumcision. And there are a lot of ways

36:43

to do that. But

36:45

Christianity kind of offers

36:47

a shortcut. You can have the Judean scriptures

36:49

and the universal God without having to be

36:52

circumcised. And I think that what happens

36:55

over the course of

36:57

the second

36:58

and third centuries,

37:00

particularly

37:04

after the Judean rebellions,

37:07

is that if

37:09

you like, the Judeans,

37:13

the Jews become the heirs of

37:16

the notion that

37:20

the God of Israel is specifically the God

37:22

of Israel. Whereas the Christians become the

37:25

heir of the idea that the God of Israel is also the God who

37:27

has created every man and woman.

37:30

And that is the process ultimately

37:32

of bifurcation.

37:35

But the key thing is that they are basically

37:38

siblings.

37:40

You know, they

37:42

are Esau and Jacob,

37:45

Romulus and Remus. I mean, this is how they're often compared in

37:49

late antiquity. In the long run, the idea

37:52

comes to be embedded that

37:54

Judaism is the mother and Christianity

37:57

is the daughter. But that's the process.

37:59

flattering to the conceit of both

38:02

because it enables Jews to cast

38:04

themselves as the primal

38:08

original way of understanding

38:10

God and Christians as kind of aberrant

38:13

whereas it enables Christians to cast themselves

38:15

as the guardians of a new covenant

38:18

that they superseded the

38:21

Jewish way of doing things so it's very flattering to both

38:23

but it's not true. I mean they are

38:25

siblings. Absolutely

38:28

and the book ends with

38:30

Hadrian's death and some

38:32

people might think

38:34

Pax, why not go on

38:36

into

38:37

Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius and

38:39

so on but I think you sort of identify

38:43

in Hadrian the sort of the glint in

38:45

the eye of what will become Byzantium that the

38:47

world will become Roman rather

38:49

than these provincial differences.

38:52

Well it's partly because I'm trying to

38:54

do it in the kind of the lifespan, a human

38:57

lifespan, a cyclum.

39:01

So you

39:03

know that someone born in

39:05

Nero's reign could live to see the death

39:07

of Hadrian.

39:11

It's also because I want

39:14

to keep stuff for the next one. Yes absolutely.

39:17

I didn't want to use it all up

39:20

but you're right I mean I think that Nero

39:23

and Hadrian are very complementary figures.

39:26

You know you have Judean revolts in the reigns

39:28

of both and both of course are obsessed

39:30

by Greece and

39:34

Hadrian does this much more successfully than Nero.

39:36

Nero pushes things too far, he kind of

39:38

poses as a tragic hero, he

39:43

gives total tax freedom, tax

39:45

exemption to the Greeks which just annoys everybody

39:47

else and his relationship

39:50

to Greece is something that definitely

39:52

precipitates the rebellion because it's while

39:54

he is away in Greece kind of

39:56

touring the festivals and racing the Olympic Games

39:59

that the rebellion start that in the long run

40:02

will topple him. Hadrian is much,

40:04

much more successful at this because

40:06

he institutes a

40:08

kind of Hellenic equivalent of the

40:11

European Union centered on Athens, but

40:13

he also very much favours Sparta and it's

40:15

this idea that Athens and Sparta and other

40:18

ancient rivals can be reconciled

40:21

into a single pan-Hellenion,

40:24

a Hellenic union. And

40:27

that the existence of this Hellenic

40:30

union will therefore redound to the

40:32

greater glory of Rome and of Hadrian because

40:34

he's the guy who's achieved it. And

40:39

I think that this

40:41

is obviously a development that

40:44

is pregnant with significance for

40:47

the future as you know. Your listeners

40:52

of all people will appreciate

40:55

that the Romans will

40:58

become the Romeoi, that they will be, they

41:01

will still think of themselves as Roman, but they will think

41:03

of themselves as Roman in Greek. And

41:06

in the, under Hadrian

41:09

you can see the kind of acorn

41:11

from which this will grow. Absolutely.

41:15

Fantastic. Let me ask you two non-Pax

41:17

questions before we

41:19

wrap up. Some listeners,

41:22

maybe one or two, may not realise you have your own

41:24

podcast now. The rest is history,

41:26

which you co-host with Dominic Sandbroek.

41:29

We could have talked about that for 40 minutes as well,

41:31

but why don't you just tease the listeners

41:34

with one topic you've covered on the show which surprised

41:37

you with how enjoyable it was to

41:40

research and learn about. I think the

41:43

Battle of Cofalga. I had a massive

41:45

animus against naval history because

41:47

I know nothing about the terms

41:50

and I'm very bored by, we always

41:52

used to go, I grew up in Salisbury and so we

41:54

always used to go on school trips to HMS Victory and

41:56

I found it terminally dull. I just

41:59

rode. Misson's, Mars, Sails,

42:02

whatever, I couldn't care less. And

42:07

we reached the stage where I thought we really should do something Napoleonic.

42:10

We hadn't done anything Napoleonic and the

42:12

anniversary of Trafalgar was coming up and I thought we

42:14

could just do a bit. I mean, how can it be? Just

42:17

tell the story in a bit. And I

42:20

had two weeks off and it was meant to be a

42:22

holiday from reading up on

42:24

subjects for the podcast. And I

42:26

read a book on Trafalgar and found it utterly gripping.

42:30

And I then became completely obsessed and

42:33

did nothing all holiday except read up about the

42:35

deep history of the Royal Navy. And

42:38

I

42:39

found it fascinating because, partly

42:41

because the battle itself is

42:44

an extraordinary, I mean, to

42:47

understand why it is, why

42:49

Nelson's tactics are so stunning, it's

42:52

really eye-opening. Nelson

42:55

himself is such a fascinating character. But

42:57

ultimately, I think I found it

42:59

eye-opening because

43:02

Nelson's victory at Trafalgar is rooted

43:04

in decades and indeed a century and a half

43:07

of British initiatives

43:16

that essentially are, in

43:18

the words of one historian, creating 19th

43:21

century islands in an 18th century

43:23

sea with the naval dockyards. These

43:26

are incubators of the Industrial Revolution, that

43:30

frameworks for resupplying ships are being developed

43:33

in the 1790s that will last right their way up

43:35

to the Falklands War. I mean, this is incredible.

43:38

And simultaneously, that to be on

43:40

a Royal Navy ship, it's

43:43

probably the healthiest place on the whole planet because

43:46

people are so concerned, not that

43:48

the crew don't succumb to disease, that

43:50

they're pushing initiatives in public health that

43:53

will, in the 19th century, apply

43:56

to cities, lead to the great revolution of which

43:58

we the beneficiaries in the 20th century. and 21st centuries.

44:01

So the sense that Trafalgar

44:05

is a battle in which the future is being displayed,

44:08

I found absolutely eye-opening and thrilling.

44:11

And I, not a naval history person,

44:13

but your description of the battle was

44:16

absolutely visceral. So that's incredible.

44:18

Yeah, I mean, the thing, you know, because the thing is that

44:21

normally in a

44:24

kind of Napoleonic era battle, and

44:27

long before ships just line up and kind of

44:29

fire at each other. And that's

44:31

it pretty much. Nelson's strategy is that you

44:33

have two prongs with a

44:35

ship at the tip of each prong, one of which is

44:38

his ship, Victory, and the other one is commanded by

44:40

Admiral Collingwood, who has a dog called Bounce,

44:43

Geordie, who goes around planting oaks when he's

44:45

not commanding ships, tremendous man. And

44:48

these guys, you know, the ships are getting

44:51

pulverised, and the officers

44:53

have to stand on the deck, and they're

44:56

not allowed to duck. I

44:58

cannot contemplate the courage that

45:01

would be required to do that. And

45:03

Nelson standing there and a cannonball screams

45:05

past and, you know, it's just a pair of

45:07

legs from the guy he's talking to, and they kind of

45:09

slowly keel over, and you know, the top

45:12

half is just vanished in a kind

45:14

of great smear of blood

45:16

and gunpowder. I mean, it's just

45:18

astonishing jaw-dropping stuff.

45:21

Do check out the rest of this history for more

45:24

audio. Final question just for me. Should

45:27

England have batted more sensibly in the first

45:29

Ashes test with Australia, or am I

45:31

a dinosaur who hasn't had my conversion

45:34

to Basbul yet? No, I think

45:36

that Basbul is tremendous.

45:38

I'm all in favour of it. It, I

45:41

mean, it's for me nothing to people, nothing about cricket. But

45:44

I think States' declaration while

45:47

tactically wrong was strategically correct.

45:49

Brilliant. Pax War

45:51

and Peace in Rome's Golden Age is out now

45:54

in the US and the UK and beyond,

45:56

I'm sure, in all good bookshops. Check

45:59

out the rest of history. read Dominion. Tom

46:01

Holland, thank you so much for coming back on the podcast.

46:03

Thank you very much for having me.

46:08

Just a reminder that if you'd like to listen to Pax

46:10

or any of Tom's other books, why not

46:13

sign up at audibletrial.com forward

46:15

slash Byzantium. That

46:17

will get you the book for free, along with a month-long

46:20

trial of Audible's service. If

46:22

you don't like it, you don't need to stay subscribed

46:24

and you can still listen

46:26

to the book features.

46:39

Did you know that personal information like

46:41

addresses and phone numbers is collected

46:43

and sold by data brokers across the internet?

46:46

Fortunately, Aura steps in, scanning

46:48

the web, sending you alerts, and requesting

46:51

the removal of your info when found. Get

46:53

a 14-day free trial of Aura's full

46:56

toolkit, including ID theft protection,

46:58

parental controls, and more at aura.com

47:02

slash safety. That's A-U-R-A

47:05

dot com slash safety.

47:09

EK's

47:11

powers the world's best practice. Here's

47:14

a show that we recommend. Welcome

47:18

to Everybody in the Pool, the podcast

47:20

that dives deep into the climate crisis and

47:22

comes up with solutions that work. I'm

47:25

Molly Woods. With this

47:27

show, I'm excited to bring you conversations

47:29

with startup innovators, business leaders,

47:32

policymakers, and everyday people

47:34

doing their best to solve the biggest challenge

47:37

of our time. We're trying to make hydrogen

47:39

commercial aviation a near-term reality.

47:41

If you eat a vegan diet, if you

47:44

reduce your green gas emissions

47:46

to 75% with every

47:48

meal. The whole reason why I started

47:50

Nest was because of climate change. Join

47:53

me every week for inspiring stories, practical

47:55

advice, and a healthy dose of optimism.

47:58

So come on in.

47:59

water's fine. Acast

48:02

helps creators launch, grow, and

48:05

monetize their podcasts everywhere. Acast.com

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features