Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hey, it's Kate. We're off
0:02
for Labor Day, but we wanted to remind
0:04
you of this episode that we made in June
0:07
of last year. It's about PFAS,
0:10
the forever chemicals that are all
0:12
around us, in much of our water
0:14
supply, in our clothing, and
0:16
even in our food wrappers. In
0:19
this episode, we look at one town
0:21
in Wisconsin caught in a battle
0:23
over PFAS. Here
0:25
it is.
0:29
Peshtigo, Wisconsin sits on the shores
0:31
of Green Bay. It's a small place. Just
0:34
about 4,000 people live there. On
0:37
its website, the town promises a
0:39
vibrant rural community full of friendly
0:41
people. Our colleague Chris
0:43
Marr visited the town this spring.
0:46
It's a quite beautiful place.
0:48
There are stands of white pine, and the
0:51
shoreline of the bay is very pretty. It's
0:53
made up of these old summer cabins,
0:56
which have now mostly become permanent homes. And
0:59
it's just in this very peaceful, shady
1:02
grove of trees.
1:06
Just outside of Peshtigo is an industrial
1:08
facility set on a big campus.
1:12
380 acres with low-rise buildings and a
1:14
stretch of tarmac, plopped right in
1:16
the middle of the Wisconsin woods.
1:19
It's one of the main employers in the area.
1:21
The facility is operated by a company
1:24
named Johnson Controls, and
1:26
this was the reason Chris was in town. Since
1:30
the early 60s, this facility
1:32
was used to test a firefighting foam,
1:34
and that foam contained something called
1:37
PFAS.
1:40
And PFAS stands for
1:42
per- and polyfluorosubstances,
1:45
and this is a class of thousands of chemicals
1:48
that have been used in industrial processes. They've
1:50
been used in tons of consumer products, from
1:53
nonstick frying pans to Gore-Tex
1:56
hiking boots and all kinds of things.
1:58
Even your grease. free pizza boxes
2:01
and fast food wrappers. No. Even
2:04
cosmetics and dental floss. So
2:06
they're very pervasive in consumer products
2:09
and in industrial uses. They're pretty much everywhere.
2:13
They may be everywhere, but
2:15
PFAS can be dangerous. Some
2:18
people call them forever chemicals because
2:21
they don't break down in nature and accumulate
2:23
over time. Scientists have
2:25
connected PFAS with health problems from
2:28
various types of cancer to high cholesterol
2:31
and thyroid disease.
2:32
And after decades of using PFAS at its
2:34
facility, Johnson Controls said
2:37
it had leached into drinking water in Pestigo
2:39
and the company has taken
2:41
responsibility for that.
2:44
But many residents believe the company
2:46
is to blame for much more.
2:48
They want Johnson Controls to take
2:50
responsibility for the contamination over
2:53
a bigger area and pay for
2:55
a solution.
2:56
So now Pestigo has a fight
2:58
on its hands. I've never
3:01
had a fight with a multinational
3:03
corporation before. You
3:06
know, I've gotten involved because it's
3:09
just wrong what happened.
3:14
Welcome
3:14
to The Journal, our show about
3:16
money, business and power. I'm
3:18
Kate Limar.
3:26
Coming up on the show, one town's
3:29
fight against forever chemicals.
3:40
A lot of credit
3:42
cards reward you for dining out, but what about dining
3:45
in? Well, the US Bank Altitude Go Visa Signature
3:47
Card earns you four times points on dining, takeout
3:49
and restaurant delivery. Plus two times points at grocery
3:52
stores, on grocery deliveries, at gas stations
3:54
and EV charging stations and on streaming services.
3:56
You can also earn 20,000 bonus points when you
3:58
spend $1,000 in the first- 90 days.
4:00
Apply for the card that fits any lifestyle at usbank.com
4:04
slash altitude go. Limited time offer. The creditor
4:06
and issuer of this card is U.S. Bank National Association pursuant
4:08
to a license from Visa USA Inc. Some restrictions may apply.
4:17
Our colleague Chris went to Peshtigo to
4:19
find out more about the town's PFAS contamination
4:22
and how residents are dealing with it.
4:25
One person he spent a lot of time with was
4:27
Doug Ointinger. He's a city
4:29
council member in the city right next to Peshtigo
4:32
called Marinette.
4:32
So the Bay of Green
4:34
Bay is out there and I'm
4:37
a little set back but I
4:39
can see the water from here. And
4:41
we sat around a wooden table and wooden
4:43
chairs and just a
4:45
kind of a dining room set right off his kitchen.
4:47
Yeah. He has a certain
4:50
gravitas. He has a certain deliberate way of
4:52
speaking and he
4:54
doesn't really mince words. You know he tells it the
4:57
way he sees it.
4:58
I can be pretty blunt and
5:00
it's like you don't want that answer. Don't ask
5:03
me that question.
5:05
Doug told Chris that he first
5:07
heard about the PFAS contamination in 2017. That's
5:11
when Johnson Controls told residents
5:13
of Peshtigo that some groundwater
5:15
in the town was contaminated with PFAS.
5:19
For decades, the company had been
5:21
spraying its firefighting foam on its
5:23
campus, which is located in Marinette.
5:26
When the foam washed off, it
5:28
seeped into the surrounding soil and the groundwater.
5:32
That foam contained PFAS.
5:35
And eventually it reached the wells
5:37
of some people in Peshtigo. At
5:39
the time, a Johnson Controls representative
5:42
said the company had been totally transparent
5:45
and would keep people informed.
5:47
It provided bottled water to people whose
5:49
wells were contaminated and promised
5:51
to test other wells in the area.
5:54
At first, Doug didn't think too much of
5:56
it. He thought the company would take care of it soon.
6:00
the right thing. And they
6:02
were surprised that this happened. I
6:06
always considered them, you know,
6:08
a good corporate citizen, which
6:11
I don't anymore.
6:15
But Doug realized that many people
6:17
in the area had no idea they might
6:19
be exposed to contamination. Around
6:22
that time, Doug and his wife joined a community
6:24
garden through a local church about a
6:26
mile from the Johnson Controls facility.
6:29
Doug noticed a shallow well that
6:31
the church used to water the vegetable patch.
6:34
And he thought of the PFAS contamination. At
6:37
a gathering for the garden, he asked about
6:39
it. And I said, oh, by the way, I don't
6:42
know if you use that for watering the garden,
6:46
but because of the contamination, I
6:48
don't think you should probably do that. Everyone
6:52
in that room, probably about 25 people, said,
6:55
what contamination? And
6:57
that's when I knew my
7:00
community had a problem.
7:04
So Doug decided to look into it. He
7:06
started digging through obscure websites to
7:08
find old environmental reports. He
7:10
looked up filings the company had submitted
7:13
to state regulators,
7:14
and he found documents that showed
7:16
the company had known about the PFAS contamination
7:19
for three years before it told state
7:22
authorities, like the Department of Natural
7:24
Resources.
7:25
The law in the state of Wisconsin says you have
7:28
a hazardous spill. You must immediately
7:30
report it to the DNR.
7:32
You didn't report
7:35
it in 2013. You
7:37
say we didn't think it left our property.
7:40
You didn't look. This isn't
7:43
stuff I made up. This isn't speculation.
7:45
These are just the facts. Is there a conspiracy?
7:48
I don't know. But I can tell you this happened and
7:50
then that happened. You can draw your
7:52
own conclusions.
7:54
This March, the Wisconsin attorney
7:56
general sued Johnson Controls for
7:59
allegedly failing.
7:59
to tell state regulators about the PFAS
8:02
contamination.
8:04
In court filings, Johnson Controls
8:06
said the state regulators acted beyond
8:08
their authority and said PFAS
8:11
was not considered a hazardous substance
8:13
when the contamination occurred. A
8:16
Johnson Controls spokeswoman said
8:18
that when the company found PFAS on the
8:20
border of its property in 2016, it reported
8:23
it to the state.
8:27
Doug
8:27
also found a document from an industry
8:29
group that laid out best practices to
8:32
prevent PFAS from getting out into
8:34
the surrounding environment.
8:35
It tells you three
8:38
things. It says,
8:40
oh, never flush this down the sanitary
8:42
sewer because wastewater treatment
8:45
plants can't take care of it. It
8:48
says, always make sure you have proper
8:50
containment so it doesn't get into
8:52
the environment. And it tells
8:54
you, don't use this for training. Use
8:57
some non-P fast foam for training. Well,
9:00
what did you do at the Fire Technology Center?
9:02
You flushed it down the sanitary sewer, you
9:05
washed it into the
9:05
environment and you used it for training
9:08
exercises.
9:10
I don't get angry at corporations
9:14
who bought something and they
9:16
weren't told it was dangerous. I
9:18
only get mad at them once they know that
9:21
they don't do the right thing. And that's
9:23
where I'm at. But like you knew.
9:31
When we asked Johnson Controls about whether
9:33
it follows industry best practices, a
9:36
company spokeswoman said, quote, we
9:38
are proud of the life-saving work we do and
9:40
we always hold ourselves to the highest standards.
9:44
The company has stopped testing firefighting
9:46
foam containing PFAS on open
9:48
ground. While
9:50
Doug was digging through all these documents
9:53
and finding out more about Johnson Controls
9:55
and the contamination, he was letting
9:57
his neighbors know too.
9:59
residents began asking,
10:02
what impact did PFAS have on them
10:04
and their families? That's
10:08
coming up.
10:15
This show is brought to you by BetterHelp. Sometimes
10:18
you're faced with crossroads in life and you don't
10:20
know which path to take. Therapy can
10:22
help you map out your future and trust yourself
10:25
to find the way forward.
10:26
BetterHelp offers convenient professional
10:29
online therapy on your schedule, however
10:31
you want it, by phone, chat, or video
10:33
call.
10:34
Let therapy be your map. Visit betterhelp.com
10:37
slash the journal today to get 10% off
10:39
your first month. That's betterhelp.com
10:43
slash the journal.
10:51
As Doug was digging into the history of PFAS
10:54
in the area, he shared his findings
10:56
with one of his friends, a woman named
10:58
Cindy Boyle, who lives in Peshtigo.
11:01
She's a bit of a local historian.
11:09
When
11:15
Cindy heard about the PFAS contamination,
11:18
she started to think about how it could have affected
11:20
her life.
11:21
It's terrifying. So
11:24
for me, it went, immediately think about
11:26
your health, and then you
11:28
start connecting the dots, like, oh yeah, I had
11:30
a full thyroidectomy in my 30s. And
11:34
then you find out it was spread on the farm fields, and
11:36
you think about all your family connections that are kidney
11:38
cancer, thyroid disease, thyroidectomy, right?
11:41
That's freaky.
11:44
While there's no way to know whether PFAS
11:46
exposure is connected to Cindy's health issues,
11:49
Chris says there is research that links
11:52
PFAS to health problems.
11:54
The EPA and the CDC
11:57
have said that they're linked to kid kidney,
12:00
prostate, and testicular cancers. They've
12:02
been linked to high cholesterol, thyroid disease,
12:05
decreased fertility, and high blood pressure
12:07
in pregnant women, and even shown to cause or
12:10
potentially lead to other
12:12
problems, such as low birth weight, reduced
12:14
ability to fight infections, and reduced vaccine
12:16
response.
12:17
But Cindy wasn't just worried about her
12:20
own health. Immediately I went
12:22
to our kids because
12:24
there's a lot of science out there that shows when children
12:27
are exposed to PFAS because of the amount of
12:29
water they consume compared to adults.
12:31
It's apparently a much different ratio. And
12:33
their body, and the fact that it's
12:35
a bioaccumulator and their bodies are developing,
12:38
the consequence that it has to children is that
12:40
much greater.
12:41
But we, in that little log cabin right over there where
12:44
it's the shallower well, so
12:46
the first driveway as you pulled in,
12:48
that's where we raised our
12:50
first and second child. And
12:53
I didn't breastfeed, I fed them on
12:55
bottled formula. And
12:58
then you wrestle with that guilt of that, and
13:01
the fear, and this is what I
13:03
mean. This is the only part of it that I feel
13:05
cowardice about is, ugh,
13:09
I just, I know how angry
13:12
this makes me. You've
13:16
got kids. And if I test
13:19
our middle son, and
13:21
it's high, I know what that
13:23
can mean for him for reproduction. I know what that
13:25
can mean for him. I'm
13:28
life-long, and to know we had a part in that. Cindy
13:32
talked about these fears with her sister. She
13:35
said, Cindy, you have so
13:37
much property there. You're self-employed.
13:39
It's such a big part of your retirement strategy.
13:42
You know the, you know what you know, you know the
13:44
health impacts. You're
13:47
either gonna address this now,
13:50
or you're gonna leave it for your kids to deal with.
13:54
That's all she had to say. And I was like, s***.
13:57
With the encouragement of her sister, Cindy
13:59
ran for... local office and won.
14:01
She's now the town chairperson.
14:03
So it has fallen to Cindy to
14:05
address the drinking water contamination.
14:08
And a big point of contention is how
14:10
many people in Pestigo Johnson Controls
14:13
should be helping.
14:14
The company said it contaminated 169
14:17
wells. It says it will pay for solutions
14:19
for those homes.
14:21
Last year, the company settled a class action
14:23
lawsuit over the contamination for $15
14:26
million. It did not admit
14:28
wrongdoing.
14:30
But the state of Wisconsin did separate testing
14:32
in Pestigo and found about 300
14:34
more contaminated wells.
14:37
Johnson Controls says it's not responsible
14:39
for those.
14:40
Now, Cindy holds town halls
14:43
where residents can debate this issue.
14:45
Chris went to one,
14:46
and a lawyer representing the facility was
14:48
there too.
14:50
So there were about three dozen
14:52
residents from the town of Pestigo in
14:54
this meeting in an older kind of
14:56
looking municipal building. Cindy
14:59
Boyle ran that meeting. And then
15:01
residents,
15:04
you know, there
15:12
was a time for open comment and residents stood up
15:14
and voiced their concerns
15:16
about the contamination on their property. And
15:20
many talked about the dissatisfaction they have
15:22
with how the company is handling things.
15:25
My wealth in Chantalmy
15:27
is double documentation from two tests.
15:31
I have received nothing. I've been paying
15:33
out of pocket for $200
15:35
a month for bottled water. The
15:38
last straw I had was when my baby grandson
15:40
was coming to stay at my house and I could not give
15:43
him a bath in my bathtub because
15:45
I didn't know how to contaminate
15:46
him. There were definitely emotions in the room. I mean,
15:49
there were people, this is a really
15:51
deeply sensitive issue, particularly
15:54
when it comes to the health of your children or grandchildren.
15:56
I think there are probably few
15:59
issues that can be as upsetting to people.
16:02
You tried to get bottled water, or you could get reimbursed
16:04
for our water, and they said nothing.
16:07
J.C.I. wouldn't take my call. Right
16:09
there. Right there. Where
16:11
are you? Right there. This is the drive-thru. Yeah,
16:14
hey, hey, I'm talking to you. Oh, but you put that?
16:16
Why, well how come when I call there, I
16:19
cannot get anybody true in my
16:21
area, how come we never get nothing done on our
16:23
site? I have no idea. Well then why
16:25
are you here?
16:26
To take notes, to learn. All
16:29
right. I'm going to contact my client, so maybe we can
16:31
do a better job if we're not doing it right now. You better start doing a better
16:33
job, you haven't done nothing. Okay.
16:37
Chris reached out to Johnson Controls about
16:39
the PFAS contamination in Pestigo. He
16:42
spoke with Katie McGinty, the company's chief
16:44
sustainability officer. Firstly,
16:46
I'm just going to say again, straight up, we
16:49
take full responsibility for
16:51
any PFAS from our operations. That's
16:54
on us to fix it, that's our job,
16:56
we are fixing it, we're determined to fix it. But
16:59
Katie says Johnson Controls isn't
17:01
responsible for the other wells that the state
17:03
of Wisconsin says are contaminated.
17:06
There's just no correlation
17:09
between our actions
17:12
and the PFAS that has been
17:14
found in the expanded area.
17:16
Are there any other industrial sources there
17:18
nearby? Or could
17:20
it be found? I mean, yes. Oh,
17:23
okay. Yes, and the
17:26
other thing is, because PFAS
17:28
is in just about every consumer
17:30
product,
17:31
certainly
17:33
every industrial process, it genuinely
17:36
is in just about everything,
17:40
your common household products,
17:41
your Scotchgard,
17:44
your Teflon pan,
17:46
your- Gortex jacket. Your
17:49
Gortex jacket. Your dental floss, I
17:51
think. Right, your dentist. It has
17:53
PFAS. And so, especially
17:56
where you have homes,
17:58
as is the case of- in this
18:01
area where you have a
18:03
drinking water well and you have a septic system.
18:06
You know, all
18:09
of that wastewater from
18:11
your dish detergent that has PFAS
18:13
in it, from your bathroom where you
18:15
flossed your teeth with dental floss
18:18
with PFAS, where
18:20
you scrubbed your Teflon pan. That
18:23
all goes into your septic system with
18:25
a drainage field that in many
18:27
cases is very
18:30
close to
18:32
the drinking water wells.
18:35
Chris spoke to PFAS experts who
18:37
questioned whether dental floss and Gore-Tex
18:39
jackets could contaminate water
18:42
at the levels found in Pestigo.
18:47
The federal
18:47
government has growing concerns
18:49
about PFAS contamination. This
18:52
month, the EPA issued a new health
18:54
advisory and it has drastically
18:56
lowered the amount of PFAS that it considers
18:59
safe in drinking water.
19:01
Some environmental groups are estimating
19:03
that more than 100 million people are drinking
19:06
water that has some level of PFAS in
19:08
it. The EPA is requiring much
19:11
greater testing across the whole country for PFAS
19:13
chemicals. And that's gonna happen
19:16
over the next few years. And there's
19:18
in all likelihood gonna be a lot of people concerned
19:20
about whether or not
19:22
my water is safe to drink.
19:25
Back in Pestigo, Doug fears that
19:27
the contamination in his community won't
19:29
be resolved in his lifetime. If
19:32
you have contamination in
19:35
the groundwater on your property today,
19:38
you will still have contamination on your property
19:42
30 years from now. It's not going away.
19:44
It's a hard, hard truth that
19:48
those of us who live, myself
19:50
included, that there's PFAS
19:53
in the groundwater underneath your
19:55
home, it's
19:57
not going away. It's a forever chemical.
20:00
It's still here. None
20:03
of us will live long enough to see it go
20:05
away because they haven't found
20:07
a technology yet that
20:10
can solve that problem.
20:32
This episode originally ran in
20:35
June 2022. Since
20:37
then, the EPA has proposed
20:40
setting federal limits on several
20:42
PFAS compounds in drinking water.
20:45
And some companies are working
20:47
on technology to destroy PFAS.
20:52
Thanks for listening. We'll be back
20:54
tomorrow with a new episode. See
20:57
you then.
20:59
This show is brought to you by BetterHelp. Sometimes
21:02
you're faced with crossroads in life and you don't
21:04
know which path to take. Therapy can
21:07
help you map out your future and trust yourself
21:09
to find the way forward.
21:11
BetterHelp offers convenient professional
21:13
online therapy on your schedule, however
21:15
you want it, by phone, chat, or video
21:17
call.
21:18
Let therapy be your map. Visit betterhelp.com
21:21
slash thejournal today to get 10% off your first month. That's
21:25
betterhelp, H-E-L-P, dot
21:27
com slash thejournal.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More