Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:02
I'm
0:07
Dave Rubin
0:07
and joining me today is an evolutionary
0:10
behavioral scientist, an
0:12
author of the brand new book, The
0:15
Sad Truth About Happiness,
0:17
and possibly, just possibly,
0:20
the most time returning
0:23
Rubin Report guest,
0:25
my old friend Gad Sad. Welcome back to
0:27
the Rubin Report. Oh, Dave, so
0:29
happy to be back, although I'm a bit dismayed that
0:31
it's not sure whether I'm the most frequent
0:33
of Gad. Please check and get back to me
0:35
with those stats. Gad, my team,
0:38
I have a very crack team here. They're
0:40
working overtime to try to figure this out.
0:43
Right now, we know that it is either
0:45
you,
0:46
Jordan Peterson, or Douglas Murray.
0:48
There's a little murkiness
0:51
around Jordan because I've done so many other things
0:53
with him that we sometimes count as shows. Sometimes
0:56
we don't, but I will say without question, you
0:59
were the first ever guest on the Rubin
1:01
Report, the first time I ever did a full
1:03
one-on-one in-studio sit-down
1:06
with another human being back in
1:08
September of 2015. It
1:12
was a test show, but I counted as the first show.
1:14
It was with Gad Sad.
1:16
Eight years ago, I can't believe it. My
1:18
goodness. Man, we were kids. You remember
1:20
that? We were kids, and
1:22
I was fatter. I
1:25
said to you right before we connected that
1:27
you're half the man you used to be, but I guess
1:30
that's a little ... Why don't we start with that? Because
1:32
mostly people tune in to you on this show to
1:34
talk about your tan and what you've been doing lately
1:36
to get that beautiful Lebanese bronze,
1:39
but also you've lost a bunch of weight. You're always
1:41
a happy guy. That's what the book is
1:43
about. By the way, I should note, I have
1:45
the uncorrected proof here, so I don't know if you
1:48
added any additional happiness
1:50
quotas or anything. This is
1:52
the final one. It's a bit more glocky
1:54
looking, yeah. But
1:56
talk to me about how the tan and the
1:58
weight loss are connected. to this whole thing. And then
2:01
we'll get on to everything else. That's
2:03
a wonderful way to start the conversation. So the tan
2:05
comes from my having just returned
2:08
from Portugal with
2:10
my family. And so there's
2:12
all kinds of happiness to unpack there. Number
2:15
one, having a great spouse with
2:17
whom you can spend your life
2:19
with. I actually discussed this in quite
2:22
a bit of detail in the book. So,
2:24
and you've met her, you know, on numerous occasions.
2:28
Having great children. I know that you recently
2:31
became a double twice
2:32
father. So you must now
2:34
finally understand what it means to have
2:37
this unconditional obsessive
2:39
love for those
2:42
carrying your genes into the next generation.
2:45
And regarding the weight, I actually discussed that
2:47
in the book when I'm discussing the
2:50
importance of persistence,
2:53
resilience. There's nothing magical
2:55
about how I lost about 86 pounds.
2:58
I think from my heaviest weight to my lightest,
3:01
I dropped 86 pounds. And I did it
3:03
by repeatedly making
3:06
the right decision on a daily basis,
3:08
right? So it's little steps. What
3:11
is the secret? Well, number one, I walk
3:14
between 15 to 20,000 steps a day. Now
3:17
the walking could be on a stationary bike. It
3:19
could be on elliptical. It could be literally walking
3:21
outside, but I have my phone with me so
3:24
that it's tracking every single step that I take
3:26
all day. No matter how I feel,
3:28
I have to reach 15 to 20,000 steps.
3:31
But of course, as you and probably most
3:33
of your listeners know, much of your
3:35
weight loss or weight maintenance comes
3:37
from what goes into this gluttonous hole.
3:41
It's about 90% of your weight loss is
3:43
going to come from what you eat. And so what
3:46
I try to do basically is
3:49
hover around 15 to 1700 calories a day. The
3:53
way that I know that is because my lovely
3:56
spouse and a very Gestapo,
3:58
Nazi-like way, track of every
4:01
single thing that goes into my mouth. And
4:03
so at the end of the day, she'll tell me, you know, you're
4:05
at 1,638 calories, don't
4:08
have any more snacks. And so by being,
4:11
you know, having
4:13
to, you know, be accountable
4:16
to number one, my steps, number two
4:18
to my daily calories, bit
4:20
by bit, I woke up one day, 18 months
4:22
later, as you said, half the man that I was.
4:24
And so that there's no secret, it's just hard
4:27
work and persistence. So obviously
4:29
we'll dive into
4:29
a bunch of the bullet points of
4:32
the book and all that. But I have to say, since we've
4:34
been doing this, since 2018, a lot
4:36
has changed in this world, politically,
4:39
culturally, everything else. You are
4:41
still in Canada, I know. I've
4:43
been trying to get you to these great United
4:46
States, preferably to the free state of Florida
4:48
for quite some time. Hasn't happened just
4:50
yet. But I thought maybe we could
4:52
talk a little bit about just how much
4:55
sort of culturally and socially
4:57
has changed. And that in many ways, these
4:59
were the exact
5:01
things that we were talking about back
5:03
in 2015 and the years since. Whether
5:06
you look now at the gender stuff, or the neo-racism
5:09
stuff, all the woke stuff that everyone talks about. A
5:11
lot of us, I would say me, you, Jordan,
5:13
Douglas, who I mentioned before, we were sort
5:16
of all warning about a lot
5:18
of these things. I can't tell how happy
5:20
should it make me that we were right about
5:22
this stuff. Well, of course,
5:25
it's- Mr. Happiness?
5:27
That's right. It's natural to
5:29
have a bit of an ego in that you
5:32
don't want to be gleeful, but you are the person.
5:34
And when I say you, meaning all the people that you just
5:36
mentioned, we are sitting in the back
5:38
of the room with our hands folded saying,
5:40
hey, I told you so. Not that
5:42
you wish to be gleeful about that, but
5:46
it is frankly frustrating because
5:48
had many people been, you
5:50
know, heeded our warnings, maybe
5:52
we wouldn't have gone down the abyss of infinite
5:54
lunacy to the extent that we have.
5:57
But look, life is autocorrective. science
6:00
is auto-corrective, bad ideas come
6:02
and go. And so taking
6:04
the point that we mentioned earlier about persistence and
6:06
weight loss, we remain persistent,
6:08
we remain committed to spreading
6:11
good ideas and hopefully there'll be an auto-correction
6:13
and these ridiculous ideas will be
6:16
in the dustbin of history.
6:18
I often ask you privately, but I'll ask
6:20
you publicly also, what does keep
6:22
you in Canada at this point? I ask this to basically
6:24
all my Canadian
6:26
guests because obviously
6:28
Canada has a lot of
6:30
problems and you've had
6:33
frozen bank accounts, not you personally as
6:35
far as I know, but I mean there have been frozen bank accounts. The
6:37
onslaught against free speech, against
6:39
the ability for people to go to church. Trudeau's
6:42
government for some reason still continues
6:44
to this day. I mean, what really keeps
6:46
a guy like you that cares so deeply about these
6:49
issues, you're now living in a place
6:51
that in many ways is, as far as a Western
6:53
country,
6:54
completely at odds with what
6:56
I know your beliefs are. Yeah, no, thank
6:58
you for that question. It's even worse
7:00
in Quebec than the rest of Canada, right? You can
7:02
be in Alberta and it's slightly
7:06
or a lot more, you know, less socialist
7:08
than Quebec. So I'm truly in the
7:10
worst possible place. What keeps me there,
7:13
Frank, I mean, there are two things. Number one, many
7:16
of the family members of both my wife
7:18
and I are in Montreal. And
7:20
since we have young children, that's always something
7:23
that's going to make it more difficult to extricate
7:25
yourself from, you know, the extended family.
7:28
But frankly, probably the number, not probably,
7:30
definitely the number one reason is that I'm a tenured
7:33
professor, right? And so in academia,
7:36
it takes, you know, it's very, very
7:38
difficult to get a job
7:40
as a professor. You could be the
7:42
most accomplished professor for you
7:44
to move from one
7:45
place to another requires
7:48
that, you know, a million things
7:50
fall into place, right? Now, when
7:52
you're tenured,
7:54
that's the ultimate, you know, protection,
7:56
right? I mean, the only thing that has allowed me to survive.
7:59
you know, the fact that I take the positions that I do
8:02
is precisely the protection of tenure.
8:04
And so to now walk away
8:07
from that without having the security
8:10
of a tenured professorship elsewhere is
8:12
very, very difficult to do, right? So, you
8:15
know, I've always talked about what
8:17
would be the amount of money that would
8:20
permit me to have an exit strategy
8:22
out of Quebec. And again, I think
8:24
that if we didn't have young children, then
8:27
that amount of money would be much lesser
8:30
in order to exit. So because of having
8:32
young children, because we have a lot of family
8:34
in Montreal, and because I'm a tenured
8:36
professor, that's what's kept me here. But
8:38
believe me, even later today, it
8:41
might interest you to know without giving too many details,
8:43
I am speaking to a
8:46
college or university in Florida precisely
8:49
to see if there's a way for me to be closer
8:51
to you. So let's... Well, I am very,
8:54
very happy to hear that. Do you think
8:56
Canada has hit peak lunacy yet, or
8:58
do you sense that it's still going to get worse?
9:00
Because I'm seeing some level of pushback now,
9:03
not just from you, but even some of the truckers.
9:06
And I had Tamara Leishon, who is one of
9:08
the lead trucker people, like there is
9:10
a new
9:11
pushback against some of the craziness, I think.
9:14
So I do see that the
9:16
the the promulgators of
9:18
the parasitic ideas are still
9:21
hanging in, and if if anything, they're only
9:23
getting worse. I think where the improvement that
9:25
you are mentioning is coming from is
9:28
the response to the lunacy. And
9:30
so you are right that a greater
9:32
number of voices in all sorts of settings
9:35
are starting to find their spines,
9:37
find their testicular fortitude.
9:39
So that makes you feel good.
9:42
But it moves so slowly, right?
9:44
It has taken many of the people
9:46
that you've been talking about a decade,
9:49
two decades, I mean, especially since I'm in
9:51
the academic ecosystem, I've
9:53
been warning about these parasitic ideas
9:55
for several decades, let alone 2014
9:57
and 2015. Remember
10:00
that my area of scientific
10:02
inquiry is applying evolutionary biology
10:05
and evolutionary psychology and understanding
10:07
human behavior. And so a lot of these parasitic
10:09
ideas, the rejection of biology, the
10:12
rejection of sex differences, existed
10:15
within my scientific pursuits
10:18
before they had entered the culture wars.
10:20
And so yes, there is improvement, but
10:23
there's a lot more work to be done.
10:25
Yeah, absolutely. All right, now to
10:27
the book, because happiness is a big topic.
10:30
And I was thinking, as I was flipping through it
10:32
before, there's something interesting about writing a book about
10:34
happiness, because it puts a lot of pressure
10:36
on the author, sort of the way I always
10:39
felt that Jordan was under a lot of pressure
10:41
by writing 12 rules for life, because
10:43
man, if he broke one of those rules, then
10:46
why would you wanna buy this book? And
10:48
to Jordan's credit, people always ask me, I never
10:50
saw him break a rule. I really, in all the years I've known
10:52
him, I've never seen him do it, but at a
10:54
happiness level, to say I'm going
10:57
to be the guy that's gonna tell people how
10:59
to be happy,
11:00
it's a lot of pressure. Now
11:02
I know you very well, and you're happy
11:04
and smiley, and you love your wife and your kids
11:06
and all that stuff, but
11:08
how much work in a life that's been fairly
11:11
complex and had its share of tragedy actually,
11:13
was it to get to that place and then to say, oh,
11:16
I can be a expert on this?
11:18
Well, thank you, that's a fantastic
11:20
question. So maybe I'll start by explaining
11:23
how I came to write a book on happiness.
11:25
If you would have asked me five years ago, was
11:28
that within my radar, I would have said no. What
11:30
led me to, and I actually discussed this in the
11:32
first chapter of the book, is that I
11:34
noticed that in my social engagements,
11:37
some of the most
11:39
powerful responses that I would
11:41
receive from people is when I offered
11:43
some prescriptive advice, right? Typically
11:46
I operate, as a behavioral scientist,
11:48
I operate in descriptive world. I just describe
11:51
why do people do what they do without
11:54
saying this is what you should do. That was
11:56
very much more the purview of, as
11:58
you mentioned, Jordan Peterson. especially
12:00
because he's a clinical psychologist. So he's helping
12:03
people don't do this pattern, follow this pattern.
12:05
Right. But then when I noticed how
12:08
much people would respond favorably
12:10
to,
12:11
you know, some, you know, 100 character
12:15
thing that I put up on Twitter, and then they're
12:17
saying, my God, that's changed my life. And I would say,
12:19
really, that struck me as a rather banal,
12:22
obvious point to make. And
12:24
then so people would write to me and say, you always,
12:26
even though you're dealing with such serious issues,
12:28
you always seem to be playful, and there's always a
12:31
twinkle in your eye, and you're always happy.
12:33
What's the secret professor? And so I said, you
12:35
know what, why don't I take because parasitic
12:38
mind, the previous book was about negative
12:41
mindset, parasitic ideas
12:43
that infect your brain. I thought,
12:45
well, why don't I now complete the story and talk
12:47
about, you know, winning mindsets, optimal
12:51
choices that you can make. But to your point, though,
12:54
I had the epistemic humility, hopefully
12:56
in writing this book, not to guarantee
12:59
you or if you implement these, I
13:01
guarantee you'll be happy. All I can say
13:04
is that statistically speaking,
13:05
if you were to implement
13:07
these or adopt these mindsets, it
13:10
increases the probability of you being
13:12
happy.
13:13
Let me ask you,
13:15
as a man of science, as you
13:17
know, I have two young boys here, and they're
13:19
only two months apart, but Justin,
13:21
who's my oldest, this kid came
13:24
out into this world with a smile
13:27
on his face and a zest for
13:29
life, and I'm going to get everything.
13:32
And Luke came out much more. I'm
13:35
going to look you up and down. I'm
13:37
going to figure out what's going on here. Think
13:39
about it. And to me, so
13:42
much of that
13:43
now spending so much time with them as I do
13:45
seems hardwired. The either
13:49
not I don't want to say desire for happiness, but the predetermination
13:51
or something that would lead someone to be just
13:54
smiling all the time versus someone
13:56
that runs a little bit cooler. How
13:58
do you factor that into?
13:59
You know, what makes them unhappy? That's
14:02
the question. About 50% of
14:05
differences across people in terms
14:08
of their happiness
14:10
stems from genes. So at
14:12
first glance you might say, oh, so it's hardwired
14:15
in my genes. No, because that means
14:17
there's 50% up for grabs.
14:19
So
14:20
Justin is born with the sun-ear
14:22
disposition. So in a sense, a climbing-mount
14:26
happiness, he's starting off
14:28
ahead. But if he then, with the 50% that's
14:32
left up for grabs, if he
14:34
then adopts mindsets
14:37
and takes decisions throughout his life that
14:39
don't optimize happiness, it's very likely,
14:42
it's Luke the second one? Luke.
14:45
It's very well possible that Luke
14:48
can overshoot him in happiness. So
14:50
I say that right off the bat. It's
14:52
obviously clear that some of us wake
14:55
up in the morning with a completely
14:57
different
14:58
daily disposition than someone who's
15:00
more sullen and so on. But again,
15:02
that's good news. 50% is
15:05
up for you to change. And so it's
15:08
exactly what you're saying, yes. It's funny because even watching
15:10
them, it took Luke a little bit longer to start
15:12
crawling. And then the second he started crawling,
15:14
I noticed he started smiling more. And it was
15:17
almost as if he wasn't that happy
15:19
because he was kind of stuck. And then once
15:21
he started moving, then he allowed a
15:23
little happiness to get in there. But let's talk about,
15:25
since we've mentioned Jordan a couple of times, one of the things
15:27
that he talks a lot about
15:28
that I think has helped a lot
15:30
of people is that your goal shouldn't
15:32
be happiness. Your goal should be purpose.
15:36
First off, I sense you agree with that,
15:38
but can you explain how do you meld
15:40
those things and what do you see as
15:42
the difference of those things? Yeah. So
15:44
in the last chapter of my
15:47
forthcoming happiness book, I have a quote
15:50
by Victor Frankel where he
15:52
basically says, don't pursue
15:54
directly success. It is
15:57
something that comes as a consequence.
15:58
And I use that because because I argue
16:00
that I completely analogize that
16:03
to happiness, and hence I agree with Jordan.
16:06
Happiness should be something that
16:08
results from you having adopted
16:11
the right mindsets, the
16:13
right decisions. And so I
16:15
think you mentioned purpose and meaning. So in one
16:17
of the chapters where I talk about the two
16:19
decisions that are most likely
16:21
to impart either a great amount of misery or
16:23
a great amount of happiness to you, I
16:25
say that the choice of spouse that you
16:28
choose
16:29
and the choice of profession that
16:31
you choose are the ones that are going
16:33
to do that, either make you more miserable
16:35
or happier. And
16:37
to Jordan's point about purpose, I
16:41
wake up every day with sort of
16:43
a gleeful, I'm rubbing my hands together
16:45
in anticipation because my job
16:48
brings me great purpose
16:50
and meaning. Today I'm gonna talk with Dave
16:53
Rubin, later I'm gonna meet a graduate student,
16:55
then I'm gonna speak to a college in Florida,
16:57
then I'm gonna put up a sad truth. I'm
16:59
constantly in creative mode. So
17:02
that's actually something I talk about in the book, that the
17:04
surest way to find
17:07
purpose and meaning, irrespective of which profession
17:09
you follow, is to instantiate
17:11
your creative impulse. Now that's a very broad
17:14
statement because I could be a chef and
17:16
be creative, I could be an architect,
17:18
I could be a stand-up comic creating
17:21
new material, I could be a podcaster,
17:23
I could be an author and a professor, but
17:25
all other things equal, if you immerse
17:28
yourself in the creative impulse,
17:30
you're more likely to find purpose and meaning. Very
17:32
few
17:33
insurance adjusters probably
17:35
wake up and say,
17:37
thank God I'm an insurance adjuster,
17:39
I find such purpose and meaning doing that. So what
17:42
do you do for that person? So for the person
17:44
that's an insurance adjuster that's watching this right now,
17:46
that it's a mundane activity,
17:48
let's say,
17:50
they might have the great spouse, they might be
17:52
making a decent living, but the day-to-day
17:54
thing, and I'm sure there are some insurance adjusters who
17:56
absolutely freaking love it, but whatever
17:59
that job is, that.
17:59
whatever we're talking about there. What do you say
18:02
to that person?
18:03
Yeah, fantastic. So they're having the levers all
18:05
day.
18:06
So in a sense,
18:08
it relates to some of the other prescriptions
18:11
that I have in the book. So I argue, for example, that
18:13
I have a whole chapter titled
18:15
Life as a Playground, right? Meaning
18:18
that immerse yourself in endless
18:20
play, even when pursuing very serious
18:23
things. So science, the pursuit of science,
18:25
is the ultimate form of intellectual
18:28
play, right? Because when you're putting together, I'm
18:30
gonna come to the insurance adjuster in a second. When you're
18:32
putting together a puzzle of a thousand
18:34
piece puzzle, you're trying to make all
18:36
these pieces fit. Well, that's what science
18:39
is, right? There's a bunch of variables out there and
18:41
I'm trying to find which one causes which
18:43
other one, which one correlates to the other or is
18:45
unrelated to the other. So it's a form of
18:47
orgiastic cerebral play. So
18:50
to the insurance
18:52
adjuster, I say that perhaps
18:55
your job doesn't allow you that
18:58
creative play pursuit, but
19:00
then at night, when you finish
19:02
your job, rather than watching
19:05
television for the next five hours,
19:07
maybe sign up for that ceramics
19:09
class that you had always wanted to take. In
19:11
other words, there is still a way for
19:14
me to pursue my creative impulse,
19:16
to immerse myself in play, even
19:19
though my profession doesn't
19:20
afford me those opportunities.
19:23
What would you say to the person
19:25
that's struggling? And I think this is probably for,
19:27
mostly for the generation or the
19:29
several generations now behind the two
19:31
of us, who are struggling
19:34
between the balance between pleasure and
19:36
happiness, meaning they've grown up
19:38
where you can watch porn all day long, you
19:40
can play video games all day long, you
19:42
can indulge in whatever it is that you like
19:44
to do all day long, basically at your phone,
19:47
as opposed to getting to the
19:49
purpose that'll bring you the happiness. And
19:52
I think a huge
19:53
amount of people are struggling with that balance.
19:56
So if I were to answer that using
19:59
an endocrinology... framework, I would say
20:01
in a sense your question can be reframed
20:04
as the difference between dopamine and serotonin,
20:06
right? The dopamine hits,
20:08
caters to my pleasure center. So
20:10
the porn or the juicy burger is
20:13
a one-time hit, but that's
20:15
not existential bliss, right?
20:18
That's not right. So, but when I sit down
20:20
and I say, I am genuinely
20:22
a happy person. I've got a great
20:25
family. I love my children. I've got
20:27
great friends. I can text Dave
20:29
Rubin in a second. He's going to respond. You
20:32
know, I, I, I read books all day.
20:34
I am existentially happy. So I
20:36
think it's really the difference between
20:38
short-term hits of dopamine
20:41
and long-term serotonin contentment,
20:44
which by the way, is something that we can also
20:47
relate
20:48
when you're choosing your partner, right?
20:50
Many people will confuse, you
20:53
know, lust and the hormones, the
20:55
neuroanatomy of lust. That's
20:57
going to fade. I don't care whether
21:00
you're married to a Greek God, Adonis
21:02
or Beyonce, you know, there's
21:04
the old expression, show me a gorgeous
21:06
woman and I'll show you a guy who's tired
21:08
of
21:09
having sex with her. That also speaks
21:12
to the reality that there is a huge
21:14
tedium that sets in if all you
21:17
are pursuing is short-term pleasure. But
21:19
on the other hand, for me to be able
21:21
to go for a walk with my wife
21:24
and, you
21:24
know, have fun and joke around
21:27
and so on, that's contentment.
21:29
So that's, I think, the difference between the two.
21:31
Do you think a lot of people don't know what they want
21:33
in a spouse, partly for what you're saying, that they're
21:36
just looking for either the sexiest person or whatever,
21:38
that they just have no idea what
21:40
their actual, uh, what
21:42
the lanes are, what the barriers are. So
21:44
for example, did you see the story just in
21:46
the last week or so about Jonah Hill sending
21:49
these texts to his girlfriend? Did you happen
21:51
to see this story? Yeah, so he sent out what I
21:53
thought were fairly, uh,
21:55
well said, controlled
21:57
statements about what his expectations in
21:59
a relationship.
21:59
where don't party with
22:02
your girlfriends, you know,
22:04
don't send out naked pictures, like some basic
22:06
stuff. And then he said, hey, if this doesn't work
22:09
for you, I'm not the right guy. Now, of course, everyone calls
22:11
him a misogynist and then, you know,
22:13
all the press is going after him. But I thought, how
22:15
impressive, there's someone actually
22:17
saying what they want.
22:19
Yes. And not apologizing for it.
22:22
So two things I'll say. So you probably
22:24
know the
22:25
Delphic maxim,
22:27
which is know thyself. So that speaks
22:29
to your point, right? Because he knows
22:31
what's going to be his
22:34
trajectory of happiness. And
22:36
he's saying, this is what I expect. And that could only
22:38
happen if I know myself. But if
22:41
I'm going to put the more general point in a scientific
22:43
framework, there are two, when it comes
22:45
to the evolutionary mechanisms of
22:47
human mating, there are two competing, if
22:50
you like, maxims. There is the birds
22:53
of a feather flock together, and there
22:55
is the opposites attract. Well,
22:57
it may interest your audience to know that
22:59
the overwhelming consensus
23:02
in the scientific literature for
23:04
long-term happiness of a union
23:07
is birds of a feather flock together. Oh,
23:09
interesting. I would have said it the other way.
23:11
Wow.
23:13
I'll tell you where you might be right. If
23:15
you said the excitement
23:17
of a short-term dalliance, right?
23:19
Let's go behind the shed and let's
23:22
have some, you know, dopamine hits,
23:24
metaphorically speaking. Then if I
23:27
am someone who is restrained,
23:29
who's sexually shy, who's introverted,
23:32
and you're the opposite, you bring me out
23:34
of my shell, those things, those opposites
23:37
might attract, and I might actually come
23:39
away a lot more enriched by the
23:41
fact that we're different. But for long-term
23:44
union, if we share values, if
23:47
we share life goals, if
23:49
we share belief systems, it's
23:51
astoundingly more likely that we'll
23:53
be happy. So what
23:54
Jonah Hill was doing was being
23:57
a perfect Darwinian being and recognizing
23:59
that that he wants someone who shares
24:01
his values. There's nothing wrong with that.
24:04
Right, I wonder if in some ways there's sort of
24:06
like a big picture, little picture version
24:08
of that, because I always find like, if I was to look
24:10
at me and David for example, we really agree on
24:12
all the big picture stuff of what we've
24:14
wanted out of life and built things together and
24:17
that's why, thankfully it
24:19
knock on wood, it's worked and it's growing and all that. But
24:22
we're very different in another, we're
24:24
opposites when it comes to attention to detail,
24:26
organization, all of those things. So
24:28
I guess there's probably a couple different layers
24:31
of all of those things. That's why when I was referring
24:33
to birds of a feather flock together, I
24:35
specifically said what those
24:38
criteria are that we should match on.
24:41
We're not trying to match on our eye color,
24:43
we're not trying to match on the morphology
24:46
of our faces.
24:47
It's life goals, it's life mindsets,
24:50
it's belief systems. That's what we're talking
24:52
about, birds of a feather flock together. Incidentally
24:54
on physicality by the way, there
24:56
is one trait that
24:59
we also have assortative mating and
25:01
that's on height. So that if
25:03
you look at naturally occurring couples,
25:07
I'm talking about heterosexual couples but
25:09
we could easily extend it to same sex couples. There
25:13
was a study that was done with 720 actual couples, one
25:18
of which, one out of 720, that
25:21
it violate the
25:24
assortative cue of male
25:26
should be taller than female. So
25:29
that's a very important cue. The only
25:32
true. Well, this doesn't bode
25:34
well for say Ben Shapiro.
25:37
Oh, his wife is taller? I'm not
25:39
sure exactly, but I'm just trying to think
25:41
of somebody that's not known as very tall.
25:43
I'm not exactly breaking the seven foot
25:46
mark, but I'm taller than my wife.
25:48
That's the most important thing. So in
25:50
other words,
25:51
it's not so much that men
25:53
have to be taller than six feet.
25:56
I mean, yeah, that's nice, but it's that
25:59
you serve. don't want to be with someone
26:01
who is taller than you. And
26:03
that's why if you're a tall,
26:06
educated woman, your chances
26:09
of finding a right man are really
26:11
precipitously decreased. Because if you're
26:14
a six foot two woman, you're
26:16
very unlikely to want a shorter guy, while
26:18
there are very fewer men who are six foot three and
26:20
more. Now if you're very educated
26:23
as a woman, you almost never want
26:25
someone who is of lesser educational
26:27
status. So now you have to find a six
26:30
foot four PhD. Good luck with that.
26:33
What do you make of how people now
26:36
go about finding that spouse? Where
26:38
everybody's flipping on apps and doing all that
26:40
stuff. Where we've sort of atomized all
26:43
of the traits that you might
26:44
actually have to in the old days go out with somebody
26:47
and figure out. Now by the
26:49
time you sit down with them at that restaurant,
26:51
you know what movies they like. You know what
26:53
music they like. You found out all of
26:56
these quirks. So we've compartmentalized
26:59
all of these things that are about the exploration,
27:01
right?
27:02
Right. And actually I've done several,
27:04
I've published several academic
27:06
studies looking at
27:08
sex differences in information
27:11
search within the mating domain. Right. And
27:14
what I have found, and even
27:16
in an online medium using actual,
27:18
you know, computer software to track how
27:20
many pieces of information you look at. So
27:22
here's an interesting piece of information. When
27:25
it comes to rejection data, what
27:27
I mean by rejection data, I mean how
27:30
much information do men and women
27:32
need to look at before they've
27:34
seen enough to reject potential
27:37
suitors? Well, women
27:39
require a lot less evidence
27:42
to reject mates.
27:43
On the other hand, when it comes to choosing
27:46
data, meaning when have I looked at
27:48
enough information to now be satisfied
27:51
that I'm ready to choose
27:53
whomever, then women
27:55
search for more information. Now that makes perfect
27:57
evolutionary sense because there's the
27:59
something called the parental investment
28:02
theory, which basically argues that
28:04
if you want to understand which of the two
28:06
sexes in a species is going to
28:08
be more sexually choosy, you have
28:10
to look at which of the two sexes
28:13
has the the the
28:15
greater amount of minimal parental obligatory
28:18
investment. And for most species,
28:20
it is females who have them the
28:22
greater minimal parental investment. Therefore,
28:25
it looms much larger for them to make
28:28
an erroneous mate search. That's why they
28:30
have to be more judicious in their mate searches.
28:32
So there's a great song by the way from the 70s. You
28:34
might know it. Carl,
28:37
why do the girls get all
28:39
prettier at closing time or something? Do
28:41
you know that song? I'm not totally sure.
28:44
We'll
28:44
see if we can grab a little sample. Actually,
28:47
it was what led to an act to a study.
28:49
I think it was a 1975 country song.
28:53
Basically what it
28:55
was arguing, if I couch it in evolutionary
28:57
language, that, you know, men,
29:00
when they go to the bar at 10 at night, they
29:03
only want to have sex with a supermodel. At 12
29:06
o'clock, she can be at seven on 10
29:09
at three o'clock in the morning, as long
29:11
as she doesn't have a tail and horns
29:13
and she still has a pulse, we're good to go.
29:16
Meaning that men relax
29:18
their threshold of acceptability as
29:21
the night of loneliness looms
29:23
in the background. But you don't see that
29:26
the other way around, right? There is no song that's
29:28
been written called, don't the guys get
29:30
more handsome
29:30
near closing time because
29:32
the fact of making a wrong choice loom
29:35
as large, whether it's at 10 in the morning
29:37
or three in the afternoon or three
29:39
in the morning for women. And so I
29:42
discuss all of these things actually in the happiness
29:44
book when it comes to mate search.
29:47
Are you surprised how many
29:49
people are not happy? I mean,
29:51
you know, we've been blessed to travel in
29:53
some pretty great circles and, you know, I know
29:55
plenty of people that I think are at least roughly
29:58
happy or trying to do something decent.
29:59
but I know a decent amount of miserable
30:02
people that have an awful lot in terms of
30:04
what you would think are the pieces that
30:06
make you happy.
30:07
Oh, you're absolutely right. I mean,
30:10
we see it on Twitter, right? I mean, I was away
30:12
for 16 days in Portugal. And
30:15
so I only posted beach photos. I
30:19
didn't weigh in on anything. So I was still posting
30:21
things, but never checking anything. And
30:24
I didn't check what my blood pressure
30:26
was pre-imposed, but I'm almost
30:29
certain there was a huge
30:31
improvement because I wasn't exposed
30:34
to the endless misery of people,
30:36
right? And you know me well,
30:38
Dave, even when I'm going after someone,
30:40
even when I am insulting them
30:43
in some spicy way, I
30:45
always do it, I hope so, with
30:48
a playful mindset. So it does actually
30:51
amaze me that people can be so miserable. Now, I
30:53
wonder, and
30:54
here I'm speculating, but I
30:56
think there is value in what I'm saying here. I
30:59
wonder if the fact that I
31:01
had my childhood
31:03
history, I mean, you know it,
31:05
but maybe some of you are listed, right? I'm a product
31:08
of the Lebanese Civil War.
31:11
So notwithstanding that I have a sunny
31:13
disposition, the fact that I've
31:15
seen some of the truly horrible
31:19
things of life, maybe that even
31:21
adds to my ability to be happy.
31:23
Because every time I
31:26
find the reason to be pissed off at something,
31:28
I can easily insert that voice in
31:30
my head that says,
31:32
you could have not gotten out of Lebanon
31:35
in 1975. So why don't you
31:37
stop your whining? This is my internal voice.
31:40
And just go out there and appreciate life. So
31:42
I think in some interesting
31:44
way, the fact that I've had to
31:46
face these anti-fragile stressors
31:49
in my childhood allows me
31:51
to be that much happier in my day
31:54
and maybe those Twitter miserable people, they
31:56
need to go to Raqqa, Syria
31:59
and see how people...
31:59
people live there and then maybe there won't be such
32:02
miserable cretins. What advice
32:04
would you give for people on the social media front in
32:06
that regard? You know I do my August off the grid,
32:08
which this will be my seventh year of doing it.
32:11
I think it actually is
32:13
one of the things that has kept me happy, insane,
32:15
and clear-minded throughout all this and I
32:17
didn't lose my mind during COVID and I didn't
32:19
lose my mind during Trump or any
32:22
of those, well, I guess that's for other people to judge, but ballpark,
32:24
I think. I kind of made it out okay. But
32:27
that social media, which of course, the word social's
32:29
in there, we're social creatures. It's designed to make
32:32
us social, but it actually seemingly
32:34
made us more antisocial, more
32:37
neurotic and fearful
32:39
of strangers and all sorts of stuff.
32:42
Well, maybe I could answer
32:45
this by drawing an analogy.
32:49
You know, we are a storytelling animal, so we often learn best
32:51
not by having sort of academic, abstract
32:54
ideas, but by contextualizing
32:57
it with a story. So to those
32:59
social media, you know, sullen
33:01
folks, listen to these two stories.
33:03
So in the last chapter
33:06
of the SAC truth about happiness, I
33:08
discussed two powerful
33:10
stories that capture
33:12
the mindset that is the antithesis
33:15
of those people on social media. So two stories.
33:18
Number one, arguably
33:20
the most incredible
33:22
conversation I've had on my show, and that's
33:24
saying a lot because just like you, I've had, I've
33:26
been fortunate enough to speak to all sorts of incredible
33:29
people, is a gentleman by the name of
33:31
David McCallum, whom you probably don't
33:33
know who that is. David McCallum is
33:35
someone who spent 29 years in prison for
33:39
a murder that he was eventually exonerated.
33:42
I think he went into prison at 17 years
33:44
old,
33:45
and he came out well
33:47
into his 40s. And as
33:49
we were chatting on the show,
33:52
I looked at him and you can go watch our
33:54
chat. It's really quite powerful. I
33:57
said to him, you know, I'm amazed, David.
33:59
I mean, you must be a reincarnation of Buddha
34:02
because I'm amazed that you're not filled
34:05
with vengefulness, with
34:07
vindictiveness, with anger. You're
34:09
a much better man than I am because if I
34:12
had been in your position and if 30, 29 years
34:15
had been stolen from me, I would wanna
34:18
burn the world down. And then his
34:20
answer, so to speak to those social
34:22
media, people who go crazy about
34:24
every little thing, he said, I have
34:27
a sister who's been bedridden
34:29
with cerebral
34:29
palsy for much
34:32
of her life. And yet she still
34:34
finds time to smile and be
34:36
grateful for what she has. And so
34:39
viewed from that perspective, I don't really
34:41
have much to be angry about. I mean, that's an incredibly
34:44
powerful story. Second guy that I'll
34:46
tell you about is a
34:48
gentleman whom I met. So when I was
34:50
a professor at University of California, Irvine,
34:53
I was sitting at a cafe in
34:55
Newport Beach, working on some
34:58
paper, whatever, and I had a whole bunch of books
35:00
all over the table. And this gentleman comes
35:03
up, says, oh, your lovely collection
35:05
of books you've got here. Do you mind if I sit with you and
35:07
chat? It turned out that he was a PhD
35:10
student at UC Irvine, completing
35:13
his doctoral dissertation on
35:15
studying homelessness. He
35:17
had immersed himself within the homeless
35:19
community to learn more about
35:22
sort of their ecosystem. And eventually
35:24
he became homeless himself. And
35:28
he was a wealthy Persian guy. So he came
35:30
from money,
35:30
he had a lot of money. And then several
35:32
years later, he became a homeless guy. Well,
35:35
I tracked him down. There's an article
35:37
that I cite in the book from 2011. So
35:39
this is about 10 years after we had met,
35:42
where someone is asking him, are
35:44
you happy? Are you sad? How
35:46
do you deal with what's happened in your life? And
35:49
his answer again
35:50
is a good answer to those social media
35:52
sullen people. He said, I've
35:54
got access to a gym where I can
35:56
keep my body healthy. I've got
35:59
access to...
35:59
to the Newport Beach Library
36:02
so I can keep my mind nourished.
36:05
I've got nothing to be angry or
36:07
sad about. Those are powerful
36:10
stories. So to those people who go crazy
36:12
about Trump and so on, there is such
36:15
a bigger world out there.
36:16
There is such misery out there, be
36:19
grateful.
36:20
Can I tell you something that just popped in my head as you
36:22
were telling that story? I have not thought about this for
36:24
probably 20 years. I'm not kidding you. When
36:26
I was in my mid-20s
36:29
and I was messed up because I was closeted
36:31
and struggling, stand up, and
36:33
I had no money, all of that stuff, I used to
36:36
stand on the corners in Times Square handing out tickets
36:38
to get people to come to the shows. That's how you get stage
36:41
time.
36:41
And there was this homeless guy out there, his name
36:43
was Charlie, because he was always panhandling
36:46
while we were handing out tickets. And I always used to think it's kind of funny.
36:48
I'm basically doing the same thing as a homeless guy. But
36:51
Charlie had the biggest freaking smile on
36:53
his face all the time, which I very specifically remember
36:55
because his teeth were horribly mangled and everything
36:57
else, but always was smiling, joking
36:59
around with everybody. He had a very funny sign about
37:02
how he was gonna, he said, I'm not
37:04
gonna bullshit ya, I'm just gonna spend the money
37:06
on booze and weed, but come on, why not? And
37:09
he was just funny. And I remember thinking that
37:11
homeless man is happier than me. And
37:13
that is one of the things that started turning me around
37:15
because I thought I have every opportunity in this
37:17
world. This guy has none.
37:19
And I truly have not thought about that
37:21
for 20-some-odd years and that just sparked out of me. I'm
37:23
glad that it triggered that. Look, right
37:26
now I'm going, I've started my big tour
37:28
for this media thing for the book.
37:31
And so, you know, this weekend I was
37:33
looking at my entire schedule. I thought, oh
37:35
my God, I've got to travel here. I got to do
37:37
this. And then I stopped.
37:39
I said, am I really whining about
37:42
the fact that I've got all these opportunities
37:45
and I have a book coming out?
37:47
F off, Gad Sag. And
37:50
so if you've got that internal voice
37:53
of authenticity, you're always able
37:55
to snap yourself back into the
37:58
right mindset.
37:59
Yeah, what are some of the other tricks
38:02
that people can use if they're really in a funk?
38:04
You know, when somebody, when you're in those
38:07
moments in life that you're just tripped up, family
38:09
problems, money problems, you're
38:11
doing the job you don't wanna do, like the whole thing
38:14
seems like it's off. You have some tricks
38:16
that can kinda just get someone going because it
38:18
seems like that first step
38:19
is off in the biggest hurdle. I actually, so
38:22
I have a whole chapter, so it speaks
38:24
partially to the question you're asking. I
38:26
have a whole chapter on sort of how
38:29
can you minimize regret
38:31
in life? Because regret in a sense
38:34
is that existential, you
38:36
know, voice that keeps coming in your head, that
38:39
makes you think, what if, what if I'd done this? What
38:41
if I'd done that, right? And so many of
38:43
us think that opportunities
38:46
for happiness have passed us by. We're
38:48
too old to be,
38:49
let's say I know that you love the NBA.
38:52
Well, that is true, that is objectively
38:54
true. It would be silly for you
38:57
or I to think
38:59
about being NBA stars, although
39:02
you have seen some of my three point shots, so
39:04
maybe I can still make it. Plus,
39:06
we have had some good back and forth.
39:09
That's right, that's right. But no, but seriously,
39:11
there are many cases where
39:14
that sense of I can't get
39:17
out of this funk
39:18
is sort of a deterministic
39:21
doom, whereas in reality, you've placed
39:23
this restriction in your, so let me
39:25
give you two, again, two examples.
39:28
Example one, this
39:31
is from in the book. There's a gentleman
39:33
who left pre
39:35
Nazi Germany. He was a Jewish guy, left
39:38
and came to Canada, had always wanted
39:40
to study and get a university
39:42
education, but
39:44
life circumstances didn't allow him to. He
39:46
comes to Canada as a young kid, goes
39:49
to work, has a successful career, retires
39:53
in his sixties.
39:54
Now he's in his sixties, right? I
39:57
mean, average undergrad is 20, 19. He
40:00
says, you know what, I'm now, I'm of good
40:02
mind. I have time. Why don't I
40:04
sign up? He actually went to the university that I
40:06
work with at, and he said,
40:09
why don't I sign up and take some undergraduate courses?
40:11
Lo and behold, a few years later, he finishes his
40:13
undergrad. Then he says, hey, I'm still young.
40:16
I'm now in my 70s. Why don't I pursue
40:18
my master's degree? Finishes it.
40:21
And then in his 80s starts
40:23
his PhD. And I remember this was
40:25
in 1996. It was very early
40:27
in my academic career.
40:29
The university newspaper had
40:32
the title, something like finally a doctor
40:34
at 91. And so he finishes his PhD
40:37
and within a year, he passes away. So
40:39
he could have easily said,
40:41
you know, I missed my opportunity to
40:43
study. Well, no, you had an opportunity
40:45
to do it and you did it. Second example, I
40:48
just had this guy last year on my show.
40:51
This is a physician who got,
40:53
I think, his medical degree at University of
40:55
Vienna in 1955. Then
40:58
while he was training to be a hematologist
41:01
as a specialist, picked up a PhD
41:04
in 1967. You weren't born
41:06
yet. I was two years old, two and a half years
41:08
old. But he had always wanted to
41:10
be a physicist. His real love
41:13
was physics. But his family
41:15
had told him, Jewish guy, you have to do
41:17
something practical, become a physician,
41:19
blah, blah, blah. And he did it.
41:21
At the age of 89, he completed a second
41:24
PhD in
41:27
physics at Brown University. So
41:29
why am I telling you these, again, these stories? Because
41:32
oftentimes we're in a funk because
41:34
we place these arbitrary
41:37
illusionary barriers in our minds.
41:39
Yes, we can be future NBA stars.
41:42
We're too old for that. We can't be ballerinas.
41:44
We're not gonna be maestro violinists. But
41:46
for many other things that would make us happy,
41:49
it's only our inner voice that's stopping
41:51
us from doing it. So get off the couch and
41:53
go do it. Can you be
41:55
too happy, do you think? I mean, we all know
41:57
the person that just kind of lives in the clouds.
41:59
that may be smiling all the time, but really
42:02
isn't on the ball or
42:04
basically isn't on planet earth. Lex
42:07
Friedman, sorry, I had something stuck in my,
42:09
well, he's not really, not that I wanted to
42:11
talk about him, but I argue
42:13
he engages in full happiness, right?
42:16
He's always, I love you, you love
42:18
me, let's hug. I think that- What
42:20
was his tweet a couple of weeks ago that everybody
42:22
went crazy on? I think you really nailed him on.
42:24
Wasn't there something not too long ago? I
42:27
don't care whether you call
42:29
yourself male or female, I
42:31
care about what your character
42:34
is or something like that. And that
42:36
pissed me
42:36
off. Now again, people think when I go after
42:38
someone, I'm trying to be me, I'm not.
42:40
And that's because there's a part of me that's
42:43
a dogged defender of truth. And actually
42:45
I
42:45
talk about this in the book, that existential
42:49
authenticity is a sure pathway
42:51
to happiness, right? I
42:54
present myself to the world as though
42:56
I'm 18 feet tall because I'm always
42:58
authentic. I really know my
43:01
qualities, I know my faults, I don't
43:03
modulate anything. And so there are no
43:05
fissures in my personhood. And that's
43:07
why I then can feel comfortable
43:09
in any setting because I've got nothing to, I
43:11
don't have to retain lies. For
43:14
better or worse, here I am.
43:15
And what I was pissed with Lex
43:18
is that, as you
43:19
know, I didn't know who Lex was frankly, but then
43:21
people said, oh, you should go on his show. That's how
43:23
I started getting to know him. And then I would see
43:26
all this inane bullshit that he
43:28
would consistently post. And it just
43:30
pissed me off. So in his case, I
43:32
don't know if he's being real or not, he has
43:35
gone into the
43:36
extra happiness because not everything
43:39
in life is about hugging and happiness, right?
43:41
I mean, that's a false
43:44
narrative and that's why I tried to go after
43:46
him. And now to his lack
43:48
of credit, he always says, oh,
43:51
I always am willing to learn from anyone and speak
43:53
to anyone. First thing he does is he blocks
43:55
me. What a schmuck.
43:58
So you can be happy. and still think someone's
44:01
a schmuck, that's good. That should definitely-
44:03
Exactly right. And by the way, to that
44:06
point, people often say to me, oh,
44:08
when they meet me, oh, you seem
44:10
so much nicer and friendlier than
44:12
on social media. No, because
44:15
this is called situational specificity,
44:18
right? If you attack me in an alley,
44:21
I might be violent because you're trying to mug
44:24
me. That's not because I'm dispositionally
44:26
violent. It's because I act differently
44:28
when I'm tucking my children to bed and
44:31
when I'm being mugged in an alley. So
44:33
when I am being mugged by assholes
44:35
on social media, I act in a
44:37
spicier manner, not because I'm not happy
44:39
or I'm mean, it's because different
44:42
strategies require different approaches, I
44:44
mean, or different contexts.
44:46
So you're a little happier when you're basically
44:49
putting your kids to sleep than you are when you're being
44:52
mugged. I just wanna make sure I got that one, Cleo.
44:55
That is a correct statement, indeed.
44:57
What about the things that people
45:00
at least get the temporary happiness
45:02
on, whether it might be the booze
45:05
or the extra indulgence in food or
45:08
whatever they might be smoking or the other
45:10
stuff?
45:11
Completely fleeting. So I talk about in
45:13
the book as someone
45:16
who studies consumer psychology, right? So I wanted
45:18
to link it to some of my own interests.
45:20
So there's been now several studies
45:22
that have looked at whether spending
45:25
money
45:26
on material possessions, so
45:28
that speaks to kind of your point, right? Should I get the next
45:30
Prada bag or the really cool Gucci
45:33
or the Maserati? Whether spend,
45:35
what brings you greater long-term
45:37
happiness? The spending on
45:41
material possessions or on experiences.
45:44
And overwhelmingly, repeatedly,
45:46
the research shows that for long-term
45:49
enduring happiness, living a
45:51
life of rich experiences is
45:54
going to bring you a lot more bang for the buck
45:56
than if you spend it on a Ferrari. And
45:58
I know this from personal experience.
45:59
because one of my brothers who
46:02
until recently lived in Southern California and
46:04
was very, very wealthy during the
46:07
dot-com era, he had not one,
46:09
not two, but three Ferraris. He had
46:11
an Austin Martin Lagunda. He had also,
46:13
he was a collector of conspicuous
46:16
consumption goods.
46:18
I hate to say it and I don't say this with any
46:20
glee.
46:22
I don't think today he's happy, right?
46:24
Whereas I never drove a Ferrari.
46:26
I never had access to a Ferrari, but later
46:29
today, my children are going to come and
46:31
are going to say, oh, how was your chat with Dave Rubin?
46:34
That moment right there is probably,
46:37
makes me wealthier than all of his Ferraris
46:39
put together.
46:41
When you get to the happiness part, so
46:43
the place that you're basically at in your life
46:45
at this moment, do
46:48
you have to keep doing work to sustain it? Or
46:50
at that point, if you feel like you got it right,
46:52
you can just kind of ride it out. I mean, do you feel like there
46:54
are things on the horizon beyond you have to keep doing
46:57
your work, keep maintaining that good relationship?
46:59
Is there anything else you gotta do to really keep pushing forward?
47:02
Well, I think, yeah, amazing question. I think
47:05
you have to keep implementing those
47:07
strategies that ensure that you are
47:10
going to remain happy. If I
47:12
were to analogize it, if I now
47:14
get off my very obsessive
47:17
weight concerns,
47:20
it won't take me long before we get
47:23
two times GATT again, right? In
47:25
other words, it won't take, I mean, literally.
47:28
I have to say, I have to say, GATT,
47:30
two times weight GATT, pretty happy. He
47:32
was pretty happy as far as I can tell. I was pretty happy,
47:35
although my blood pressure was not as happy.
47:38
Although my physician was not as happy
47:40
with me. So again, I think from the perspective
47:43
of extending my happiness as far as I can
47:45
go, literally in terms of life expectancy,
47:48
and contrary to what Professor Dr.
47:50
Lizzo tells us, you
47:53
know what I'm talking about, right? Yes, I got
47:55
it, Lizzo. She's, they're
47:58
fortifying the stage.
47:59
find the stage and she argues that
48:02
you know stop talking about this nonsense
48:04
about health being related to your
48:06
weight that's just a construct.
48:10
My life expectancy, knock on wood,
48:12
is hopefully going to you know drastically
48:14
increase by virtue of you
48:17
know my having now been be
48:19
at the right weight but I have to always be
48:22
careful right and so to your
48:24
point about happiness I don't think you can
48:26
get to mount happiness to the summit
48:28
and say I've done it all now let me
48:31
take crystal meth and I will continue
48:33
to be happy. You still have to work on your
48:35
relationships, you still have to be playful,
48:37
you still have to nourish your mind, all those things
48:40
are perpetual pursuits.
48:42
Dad watch very closely the screen
48:44
right now because I'm gonna wink at you as I
48:46
ask you this question. Can
48:48
you mindfully meditate yourself
48:51
into happiness? Some
48:55
of the audience will know what I just asked
48:57
and some will not it's okay. Yes
49:00
as a matter of fact so in one of the chapters
49:03
I'm gonna come to your mindful meditation in
49:05
a second. In one of the chapters
49:07
I talk about the fundamentally
49:11
most powerful law in nature which
49:13
is what I call the inverted U curve.
49:16
Inverted U which the ancient Greeks
49:18
already knew about
49:19
is too little of something is not
49:22
good, too much of something is not good
49:24
and the sweet spot is somewhere in the middle which
49:26
Aristotle referred to as the golden mean
49:29
which Buddha referred to as the middle way, Maimonides
49:32
referred to it and so in that chapter
49:35
I demonstrate that across
49:38
a bewildering number of contexts
49:40
that inverted U applies including
49:44
to mindful meditation meaning
49:46
that if you never are mindful
49:49
in terms of meditating or taking a deep breath
49:51
or something it's not good but doing
49:53
it too much it's not good and actually that
49:55
speaks to a tweet that I
49:58
think Elon Musk...
49:59
that sent to that person
50:02
in question saying, so and so,
50:04
there is such a thing as too much meditation.
50:06
So that exactly speaks to your point. Always
50:09
find the middle way, the sweet spot, you'll
50:11
be happier.
50:13
Get, I have to say, one of my great joys
50:15
in life is that I think I found the spouse
50:17
I was supposed to find. We'll put that one aside,
50:20
but the other one that I'm doing the work that I'm supposed to be doing, and
50:23
that it has allowed me to have friendships like I
50:25
have with you, because we've done this, it seems like
50:27
a long time, but it ain't that long,
50:30
but we both somehow still
50:33
managed to do this with a smile on our face and
50:35
to traverse some new ground, and
50:37
that's why it's a pleasure always talking to you, my
50:40
friend. You're at the light, big e-hug, and
50:42
I hope to see you in Florida soon.
50:45
What else can I offer you? Freedom,
50:47
low taxes, the weather's great,
50:50
you'll keep the tan. I mean, what am I doing here?
50:52
You're okay with sweating. Give
50:54
me some tenure to replace
50:57
my tenured professorship. Give
51:00
me tenure or give me death. That could
51:02
be your next book. The
51:04
book is, Happiness, Eight Secrets for
51:06
Leading the Good Life. Gad
51:09
Sad is leading a good life. Good to see you, my friend. Thank
51:12
you, Dave. So good to talk to you, cheers.
51:14
Thank you, Dave. So good to talk to you, cheers. Thanks
51:16
for tuning into The Rubin
51:19
Report. Don't
51:23
forget to review, share, and subscribe
51:25
to this podcast. If you're looking for early
51:27
and exclusive content, you can join me on
51:30
Locals at rubinreport.locals.com.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More