Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
On Friday, a judge in New York City said
0:02
Donald Trump had to pay $355 million plus interest
0:08
for repeatedly manipulating the value of
0:10
his assets. On Saturday, Donald Trump
0:12
launched a new sneaker line. Coincidence?
0:16
You be the judge. And
0:19
we're going to remember the young people and
0:22
we're going to remember sneaker con, you
0:24
know that. Some people
0:26
think he's trying to win votes with
0:28
the never surrender high tops and the
0:30
POTUS 45 whiteness. This
0:34
is connecting with black America because they
0:36
love sneakers or interest sneakers. They love
0:38
the, you know, there's a big deal
0:40
certainly in the inner city. We'll take
0:42
your word for it Fox News. They
0:44
are definitely a collectible item. What's clear
0:46
is the former president needs money, lots
0:48
of money. And on today's explain, we're
0:50
going to remind you why and talk
0:53
about the implications for Americans and the
0:55
rest of the world. That's the real deal.
0:59
That's the real deal.
1:06
In 1937, two researchers had a
1:08
kind of dangerous idea. So
1:10
they figured the perfect place to test it out
1:12
was in an elementary school on kids
1:15
on the eve of a massive epidemic. The
1:17
idea was air would go through these things
1:19
they called a radiation chambers, UV rays would
1:21
blast the air and it would kill off
1:23
the pathogens. This
1:27
week on unexplainable, could a century
1:29
old hunch about ultraviolet light save
1:31
us from respiratory disease? And
1:33
if so, what's the catch? Listen
1:36
to unexplainable new episodes every Wednesday.
1:40
Is living in the United States bad for the health
1:42
of black Americans? When black immigrants
1:45
come to United States, their health
1:47
status is on par with white
1:49
Americans. But what happens is after
1:51
one to two generations, their
1:54
health status actually declines to that
1:56
of black Americans. ages
2:00
black people taught is not just
2:02
me on the weekends. New episodes
2:04
every Wednesday. Bink,
2:10
bink, bink, bum, bum, bum,
2:12
bum, bink. Thanks,
2:15
Blaine. Sean Ramos-Virme here with reporter Andrea Bernstein,
2:17
who was sitting in the same courtroom as
2:19
the former president for his civil fraud trial
2:21
in New York, which must have been totally
2:24
exciting, right? I mean, it
2:28
was excruciatingly boring.
2:32
One of the things that was so interesting
2:34
to me is Trump came 10 times to
2:36
this business fraud trial. That
2:39
meant that he was sitting every day in the courtroom
2:41
from 10 until about 1 and 2.15 until about 4.30
2:43
watching, as
2:46
lawyers from the attorney general's office said,
2:48
things like, let me direct your attention
2:51
to cell number 168
2:53
on sheet G of this
2:55
spreadsheet. Is that your notation? And
2:59
reporters took to bringing binoculars to the
3:01
courtroom so that they could read these
3:03
spreadsheets. Absolutely. That was a pro tip.
3:06
So there was a lot of that. And because
3:09
there was no jury in this case, sometimes it
3:11
was really confusing to figure out, like, what was
3:13
it they wanted to get out of this witness?
3:15
What was it they wanted to learn? But
3:18
they put in this torrent of documents.
3:20
And we'll take one witness, say, for
3:23
example, the former president's daughter,
3:25
Ivanka Trump. Ivanka Trump was not
3:27
a defendant in this case. And a
3:29
lot of the sort of reviews of her
3:31
testimony is, oh, she was so disciplined. She
3:34
kept her cool, all
3:37
of which was true. But while
3:39
she was testifying, the attorney
3:42
general's office kept saying to her, do you recognize this
3:44
document? Is that your email? And she would say yes.
3:47
And these emails were
3:49
central to the case, because
3:52
she arranged these very, very
3:54
low interest rate loans from
3:56
Deutsche Bank. There was all
3:59
the documentation. The regular
4:01
banks wanted to charge her family maybe
4:03
in the low double digits of interest.
4:06
The interest rate they got was 2, 3%. So
4:09
there's a huge difference there, and that is a
4:12
lot of what the money
4:14
that the Trumps have to pay back to New York is,
4:16
is the difference in the interest rates. There
4:18
in Ivanka Trump's email, it's all laid out how
4:21
she went to the commercial real estate division,
4:23
she tried to get the loan, they didn't
4:25
like the number, so they went to this
4:28
other division and got this way lower rate
4:30
that no one else could get, and to
4:32
get it, they had to
4:34
attest to Donald Trump's statements of values
4:37
that we now know were completely fraudulent. So
4:39
a lot of granular detail from the
4:41
Attorney General in New York, how does
4:44
the former President's defense team defend
4:46
him? So one of
4:49
their big defenses is, no one was hurt
4:51
here. Deutsche Bank wanted us as a customer.
4:53
They were willing to give us these incredibly
4:55
low rates because it was
4:57
good for them. They benefited. There was
4:59
no victim. That was one.
5:02
Another one was, our accountants figured
5:04
it out, our employees figured it
5:07
out, we left it to them, we trusted
5:09
them. And then
5:11
there was like, nobody really
5:13
relied on these statements, and
5:16
also it didn't make a difference. Okay,
5:19
so Trump's legal defense team essentially says,
5:22
show us a victim, everyone got paid,
5:24
this was good for everyone, but the
5:26
judge ultimately decides
5:29
that's not the case. Well, the
5:31
law decides it, right? I
5:34
mean, this law, 6-6-12, was a very powerful
5:36
law in New York. And it was
5:38
written in the middle of
5:40
the last century with the idea that if
5:42
you have a fraudulent marketplace,
5:45
you corrupt the business market in New York.
5:47
And it is the Attorney General's job to
5:49
defend against that and to make sure that
5:52
people don't do this as a course of
5:54
business, no matter who
5:56
the victims are, because the idea is that
5:58
hurts all business in New York. today
6:01
the court once again ruled
6:03
in our favor and in
6:05
favor of every hard-working American who
6:07
plays by the rules Donald
6:10
Trump and the other defendants were ordered to pay 463.9
6:14
million dollars that
6:18
represents 363.9
6:21
million dollars in disgorgement plus
6:25
100 million dollars in interest which
6:27
will continue to increase every
6:30
single day Until
6:32
it is paid. Where does that
6:34
number come from Andrea? It's big. Okay,
6:37
so let me introduce a concept Which
6:40
I know today explained listeners can
6:42
handle which is called disgorgement, right?
6:44
It's not actually a fine Oh what
6:48
the law says is if you Have
6:52
these ill-gotten games based on the fact that
6:54
you lied over and over and over again.
6:56
You have to pay a back Donald
6:59
Trump may have authored the art of the
7:01
deal But he perfected
7:03
the art of the steel So
7:06
a very big portion of
7:08
the money that Trump has to pay comes
7:11
from The cash that
7:13
he kept by keeping his
7:15
interest rates so low So, you know if
7:17
you have to pay 12% interest versus 3%
7:20
interest hypothetically, those are not
7:22
the actual numbers But for
7:24
example, you save a lot of money in
7:27
this case The difference in the
7:29
interest was about a hundred and seventy million dollars. So
7:31
that is considered an ill-gotten gain got to pay it
7:34
back then the
7:36
judge said well Because they had all
7:39
this extra cash that they weren't entitled to They
7:41
were able to pour money into a number
7:44
of properties to in particular
7:46
the Trump International Hotel in Washington
7:48
DC and the Ferrypoint Golf
7:50
Course, which is in Bronx, New York
7:53
They were able to pour so much money because they
7:55
had all this extra cash and then sell it and
7:57
make even more money So All of
7:59
that comes. Back to so that's how they get
8:01
to the Three Fifty Five. Okay,
8:04
And this is on top of the a three
8:06
point three million he already has to pay. it's
8:08
eg, and care. Totally separate case,
8:10
correct in the eg, in carol.
8:12
Case the jury awarded heard
8:15
something like sixty million dollars
8:17
more. Than. Her lawyers were
8:20
asking for in this latest case
8:22
because of disgorgement defined as three
8:24
hundred fifty five million big numbers.
8:27
Do you think he might be
8:29
getting hit harder in either case,
8:31
then say oh less famous former
8:34
president New York City civilian would.
8:36
Solicit. Didn't care of someone of
8:39
things that was so interesting and
8:41
eat. And as right before the
8:43
plaintiffs wrapped up their case, they
8:45
played a video deposition of Trump
8:47
from the business fraud trial. And
8:50
into this is franchise. And says
8:52
I have four hundred nine hours
8:54
and cash. That is very unusual
8:56
for developers. developers don't usually have
8:59
that much cash. Marla. Dell
9:01
is worth one point five million. Doral.
9:03
Dove courses were two point five billion.
9:06
Does he take the rally? the doral could
9:08
be was. So. In a opinion
9:10
by itself that there's. Those
9:12
valuations have been found to be
9:15
fraudulent by a judge and glance,
9:17
but the German know that. Race:
9:20
So the jury is.
9:23
Watching. This and Eating Carols
9:26
lawyers say to the jury.
9:29
Trump. Says he has a lot of money. Please.
9:31
Have him pay a penalty that will
9:34
get him to stop. Him: you.
9:36
Determine how much that amount is. So.
9:39
In that case, they
9:41
asked. The. Jury for.
9:44
An amount of money in damages
9:46
to rehabilitate her reputation. But. then
9:49
they said give us and punitive damages you
9:51
figure out this guy says he has billions
9:53
of dollars you use an amount that will
9:55
make him stop and that's how they came
9:57
up with the sixty five million plus the
9:59
eight million for her to
10:02
repair her reputation. Does
10:05
Trump have to hand over this nearly
10:07
half a billion dollars like tomorrow? When
10:09
does he actually have to pay? The
10:12
355 million doesn't include the
10:15
pre-judgment interest, and the Attorney General's office has said
10:17
it will be upwards of $450 million when you
10:19
put that all in. Now,
10:23
Trump is appealing. They say the
10:25
verdict is wrong. As past
10:27
is prologue, they will take
10:30
every opportunity to appeal this case. It can
10:32
be appealed first to the first
10:34
level of New York Appeals Court, which is called
10:36
the First Department, then to
10:38
the highest court, which is called the Court of
10:40
Appeals, and in most cases that
10:43
would be the final word. However,
10:45
being Trump, they may argue that there's
10:47
a federal issue involved, so it would
10:49
theoretically go to the U.S. Supreme Court. So
10:53
all of that has to happen before the money
10:55
is finally transferred to New York
10:57
State, but there
11:00
is talk about putting up a
11:02
bond, putting the money in escrow.
11:05
He can't just go
11:07
off and say, well, I'm not going to pay it until
11:10
we're done. That isn't the way the law works. Maybe
11:12
the half a billion dollar question is, will he
11:14
still have to pay if he wins
11:17
the election later this year? Assuming
11:19
he loses all his legal appeals,
11:21
the answer is yes. I
11:24
wouldn't be surprised if the case is
11:26
not resolved, and were he to win
11:28
the election to hear his lawyers make
11:30
an argument that even to address this
11:32
issue is too distracting for the president.
11:34
Now, there is Supreme
11:36
Court law in Bill Clinton and
11:39
Paula Jones that certain aspects of a civil
11:41
suit can continue, and this is a civil
11:43
suit. So I
11:46
hate to say this
11:48
because it's so overused in this context,
11:50
but it's uncharted waters. In
11:52
theory, yes. In theory, the judgment
11:54
has been made. If Trump loses all his appeals, he has
11:56
to pay the money. He has to
11:58
find the money now. to guarantee that
12:00
he will be able to pay it in the event
12:03
he loses all his appeals. But
12:05
what would happen would he try to argue that?
12:08
If past is prologue, it's not another question.
12:16
Andrea Bernstein, she's the host of a
12:18
podcast called We Don't Talk About Leonard,
12:20
about the American judiciary's shift rightward. Find
12:23
it wherever you listen. She's also the
12:25
author of American Oligarchs about the Trumps
12:27
and the Kushner's. Find it wherever you
12:30
read. Donald
12:33
Trump owes about half a billion
12:35
dollars after two unfavorable rulings. Sounds
12:38
like a Donald Trump problem, right?
12:40
When we're back into the explained,
12:42
Vox's policy correspondent Abdullah Fayyad says
12:45
it's actually everybody's problem. Support
13:01
for the show today comes from Cook Unity. Is
13:03
there a local restaurant dish you've been craving but
13:05
can't make it out of the house? You might
13:07
want to check out Cook Unity. Cook
13:09
Unity says they're the first,
13:11
quote, chef to you service,
13:13
delivering locally sourced meals from
13:15
professional chefs straight to you
13:18
every week. I have
13:20
not had locally sourced meals delivered
13:22
straight to me any week, but
13:25
my colleague, Sarah Frank, she
13:28
has. Cook Unity meals have really
13:30
beautiful presentation, but also more importantly, they're
13:32
really easy to heat up either in
13:34
the microwave in a few minutes or
13:36
in the oven in less than 15
13:38
minutes. You can go to cookunity.com/explained
13:40
or edit the code explained before checkout
13:42
for 50% off your first week.
13:44
That's 50% off your first
13:47
week by using the code
13:49
explained or going to cookunity.com/explained.
14:00
Indeed wants you to never again have
14:02
a long drawn out hiring process to
14:04
just find the right person.
14:07
Indeed is a matching and hiring platform. It
14:09
has this engine that's still to help you
14:11
find quality candidates fast. According
14:13
to a recent survey done by Indeed, 93% of employers
14:15
agree that Indeed delivers the
14:19
highest quality matches compared to other
14:21
job sites. Indeed can schedule, screen,
14:23
message, how do they do it?
14:26
Indeed says they leverage over
14:28
140 million qualifications and preferences
14:30
every day, so their matching
14:32
engine is constantly learning. Listers
14:35
of this show can get
14:37
a $75 sponsored job credit
14:39
to get your jobs more
14:41
visibility at indeed.com/explained. You
14:43
can go to indeed.com slash
14:45
explained and tell them you heard about Indeed
14:47
on Today Explained. indeed.com
14:50
slash today explained. Terms and
14:52
conditions do apply. Support
14:59
for today's show comes from Quintz. Have
15:01
you ever caught yourself spying some fabulously
15:05
chic fashionista
15:08
sporting a beautiful Mongolian
15:11
cashmere sweater and
15:14
thought I simply must have
15:16
it, but how will
15:18
I ever afford such a timeless essential?
15:21
Quintz has the answer to that
15:24
very question. Quintz creates timeless essentials
15:26
like that Mongolian cashmere sweater along
15:28
with other must haves like
15:30
100% leather jackets and
15:33
versatile flow knit activewear.
15:36
I've never worn flow knit
15:38
activewear, but maybe Vox's Sarah
15:40
Frank has. I had heard
15:42
great things about their cashmere from my colleagues,
15:44
so I immediately went there first and was
15:47
really impressed with the huge selection of sweaters,
15:49
cardigans, and pants for all under $100. returns
16:00
that is quince.com/explain
16:02
to get free
16:04
shipping and 365 day returns quince.com/explained
16:20
explained 2024 explained
16:23
we're back and Vox's Abdullah Fayyad is
16:25
here to tell us why Donald Trump's
16:28
half a billy in legal debt is
16:30
everybody's problem. It's everybody's problem
16:32
because he's running for president of the
16:34
United States. And what it
16:36
generally means when any candidate running for
16:39
public office, let alone the presidency, when
16:41
they're in debt, is that there
16:43
can be a lot of leverage used against them
16:45
when they're in office by their creditors. In
16:48
this particular case, it's not just a
16:50
matter of Trump being in debt, it's
16:52
a matter of him potentially being cash
16:55
strapped, you know, facing nearly
16:57
half a billion dollars in civil
16:59
damages from just two civil lawsuits
17:01
alone. And being on the
17:03
hook for that money while he's running for
17:06
office again means that any
17:08
donor, any special interest group, any
17:10
bank, any foreign government that's
17:12
looking to curry favor in a potential
17:14
second Trump term could swoop in and
17:17
help bail him out. It
17:19
doesn't necessarily mean it would be
17:21
kind of an explicit quid pro
17:23
quo. I want no quid pro
17:25
quo. But this is exactly how
17:27
money and politics works. You
17:30
know, we see it for every candidate when it
17:32
comes to fundraising for their campaign. In
17:34
Trump's case, it's kind of fundraising for
17:37
his own kind of survival as a
17:39
businessman. And a lot of people can
17:41
step in and essentially advance their interest
17:43
in their second term by having that
17:46
relationship with him and having
17:48
that leverage over him potentially as his creditors.
17:50
But I gotta ask, we don't ever
17:53
really know how rich, how
17:55
broke Donald Trump is, but
17:57
we know he owns some
17:59
serious real estate. estate, couldn't he just
18:01
sell a building or two, a
18:03
tower or a rosy,
18:06
gaudy mansion in Florida or something
18:08
and be done with all of
18:10
these debts? He could.
18:12
And I think what should be clear
18:14
to most people is that even after
18:16
all of this, Trump is still going
18:18
to be a rich man. The question
18:20
is just how much cash he has
18:23
on hand to pay these civil damages
18:25
right now. So he's on the hook
18:27
for over $450 million. That's
18:30
due soon. Even if he appeals, he has
18:32
to front a considerable amount of money, potentially
18:35
the entire amount and even some interest while
18:38
that appeals process plays out. And the question is
18:40
where he's going to come up with that cash.
18:45
Based on his own accounting last April in
18:47
a deposition, he mentioned that he had $400
18:50
million in cash, which is a lot
18:52
of money even for a billionaire in
18:54
cash. But that's still not enough to
18:56
cover these damages, which means that yes,
18:59
he will have to liquidate some of
19:01
his assets. For him, that's an uncomfortable
19:03
thing to do because A, it's
19:06
a big part of his personal identity. It's
19:08
part of his political identity. And it kind
19:11
of shows that he's in a lot of
19:13
trouble. It kind of shows the kind
19:15
of a weakness on his part that he
19:17
really does not like to do on the
19:20
public stage. And so will he survive this
19:22
as an individual being able to pay his
19:24
bond? Of course he can. His net worth
19:26
is estimated somewhere between $2 and
19:29
$3 billion, though obviously it's very opaque and
19:31
we actually know very little about his finances.
19:34
But it's still going to do a good
19:36
amount of damage both politically, but also in
19:38
the short term financially. I mean, the fact
19:40
that he would have to liquidate some of
19:42
his assets means that his business
19:44
is going to suffer. He's going to lose
19:47
some of his assets in the short
19:49
term. And that actually could deal a
19:51
blow to his businesses, which is by
19:53
design. This is what these penalties are
19:55
supposed to do. They're partly supposed to
19:58
be punitive. And so that's why There's
20:00
such a high sum. It's because he has such
20:02
a high net worth Okay,
20:05
so you're saying basically yes, he
20:07
could sell his assets But he
20:09
probably won't want to and that's
20:11
why we should be concerned not
20:14
exactly that It's just a matter of
20:16
you know him having to front so
20:18
much money in the short term That
20:20
even if he does liquidate some of
20:22
his assets in order to maintain His
20:25
finances he's probably going to have to take
20:27
on more debt and take on more loans
20:30
And you know just for context when he was
20:32
running for reelection in 2020 He
20:35
was per the New York Times reporting on his tax
20:37
returns which were leaked before the election in 2020 He
20:40
was running with about 400 million
20:42
dollars in debt most of
20:44
which was coming due in the next four years So
20:47
had he won a second term in 2020? Creditors
20:50
as the New York Times put it
20:52
back Then would have been put in
20:54
the unprecedented position of potentially having to
20:56
foreclose on a sitting president of the
20:58
United States That's never really happened before
21:00
we might be facing a similar situation
21:03
Now you know if he has to sell
21:05
some of the assets He's still going to
21:07
have to take on more loans in order
21:10
to fund his businesses And you know the
21:12
fact that his business will be dealt
21:14
a blow through these civil damages He
21:17
is going to have to likely take
21:19
on more loans And that just puts
21:21
him in a bad situation with creditors
21:23
Even if they are big creditors big
21:25
major financial institutions that are quote-unquote trustworthy
21:29
But you know it's still kind of
21:31
a serious liability for any candidate to
21:33
just have that much amount of debt
21:35
in public And just one more thing
21:37
on this is you know federal government
21:39
employees generally are graded on certain criteria
21:42
To see whether or not they can qualify for
21:44
security clearance Having an enormous amount
21:46
of debt is one thing
21:48
that's used against giving people security
21:51
clearance because it's Primarily seen as
21:53
a tool that can be used
21:55
to target people for bribery and
21:58
things of that nature just
22:00
kind of improper conduct while in office. So that's
22:02
kind of a window into the ethics problems that
22:04
could come up should he win a second term.
22:07
The timing here is kind of interesting because of
22:09
course the president is in the midst of
22:13
raising a war chest to go
22:15
up against Joe Biden. How's that going for
22:17
him? Well, it's actually not going well at
22:20
all. There was a report in Axios with
22:22
Biden having much more cash on hand, the
22:24
Biden reelection campaign having much more cash. I
22:27
think they had over $130 million cash on hand compared
22:29
to Trump's $33 million cash on hand at the beginning
22:35
of the year. And the RNC,
22:37
the Republican National Committee, only had $8
22:39
million cash on hand. So comparing
22:43
it to Joe Biden, he's actually not
22:45
doing well at all. That
22:47
said, it's still early. It's still
22:49
the primaries technically, and he
22:51
has a lot of time to make up that
22:54
gap. But part of
22:56
Trump's problem going into the general
22:58
election is that a lot
23:00
of the campaign money has been used
23:02
to cover his legal expenses. And
23:05
actually, one of his political action
23:07
committees, the Save America PAC, has
23:10
spent over 80% of the
23:12
cash it raised on Trump's legal
23:14
fees. And in the last year, it was
23:16
reported that Trump spent over $50 million in
23:18
campaign cash
23:20
on legal expenses alone. So
23:23
going into the general election where they're going
23:26
to have to spend money on television ads,
23:28
on ground operations, he's
23:30
not in good financial shape
23:32
for a conventional candidate. The caveat
23:34
here is that Trump and
23:36
his following are unconventional in
23:38
American politics. And we
23:41
do know that he is very
23:43
capable of turning out voters. So
23:45
he might not need that conventional
23:47
campaign spending that people generally do
23:50
in a general election. But from
23:53
just a campaign finance standpoint, this
23:55
certainly hurts him a lot. You
23:58
say this This
24:00
is everyone's problem, but it's
24:03
worth remembering here that Trump's base doesn't
24:05
really think all of this is a
24:07
problem. They're super stoked to vote for
24:09
this guy, and it looks like all
24:11
of his legal troubles actually help him
24:13
with the Republican base. What
24:17
should we make of that problem? I mean,
24:19
that's one of his gifts as
24:21
a campaigner and as a politician,
24:23
is how he's able to galvanize
24:25
his support and make people look
24:27
the other way when he has
24:30
all of these ethical problems. That's
24:33
certainly true for his supporters, and you see how
24:35
willing they are to help him through this. Actually,
24:38
donating to his campaign every time he
24:41
uses one of these legal
24:43
cases against him and drumming up support from his
24:45
base by getting small dollar donations by saying that
24:47
this is a witch hunt, that they're coming after
24:49
him because they want to come after his supporters.
24:52
You have people paying essentially
24:55
to protect a billionaire who can more
24:57
than afford to pay for himself. So
24:59
this is just part of the cult
25:01
of Trump. It's just kind of hard
25:03
to overcome. But
25:06
the reality is that he has
25:08
a lot of supporters, people who
25:10
vote for him, who do see
25:12
flaws in him, who eventually
25:14
can be swayed. They might be the minority
25:16
of his voters. They're certainly not the base,
25:19
but people who turn out in elections,
25:21
there are people who make up their
25:23
mind right at the end. At some
25:25
point, and this is all speculation, but
25:27
there can be enough baggage on somebody
25:29
that makes somebody feel a little too
25:31
queasy when they go into the voting
25:34
booth. I think overall,
25:36
you see this in polls that
25:38
people do think Trump should be
25:40
held accountable for crimes he committed.
25:45
But obviously it's a very partisan thing
25:47
going into the general election, and
25:49
I think that's the danger here. He's
25:52
able to use that kind
25:54
of support to undermine the
25:56
validity of these cases against
25:58
him. that they're
26:00
a witch hunt, he's undermining kind
26:02
of, you know, his actual accountability,
26:04
that it's, you know, undeserved, that
26:06
he thinks that he's making
26:09
people believe that these really are just
26:11
witch hunts. When in reality, Trump has evaded
26:13
accountability his entire life. And this is
26:15
really just the first time he's actually been
26:17
held accountable on a deserved scale for kind
26:19
of the fraud that he's engaged in throughout
26:22
his business career. Abdullah
26:27
Fayad Vox. Abdullah wrote, Trump is
26:29
suddenly in need of a lot
26:31
of cash. That's everyone's problem. You
26:33
can read it at vox.com. Today's
26:35
episode was produced by Amanda Llewellyn
26:37
and Abhishek Artsy. It was edited
26:39
by Matthew Collett, fact-checked by Laura
26:41
Bullard, and engineered by
26:44
David Herman. It's today explained.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More